Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
using it. Thankyou
--
Best regards
Barry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:49:47 PM, Plusnet wrote:
P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
P using it. Thankyou
Simply put, this is a program that allows you to 1. Digitally sign
your
Hello Plusnet,
On 19 October 2003, at 14:49:47 (GMT +0100) you wrote:
P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly
P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off
P using it. Thankyou
For more information (and details) you may visit www.pgpi.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Shauna!
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 1:25:17 AM you wrote:
SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous
message, the
SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the
message
SS after signing it?
To counter
Hi Shauna,
on Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:36:26 -0600 GMT (which was 22.04.2001, 00:36
+0100 GMT where I live) Shauna Scott wrote:
So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
get it to work with The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Saturday, April 21, 2001 at 3:07:40 AM you wrote:
Freeware or Payware?
If you want to use it in a non-business environment stick to freeware.
PGP is available in both flavours and in versions
6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your
Hallo Shauna,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:39:36 -0600 GMT (21/04/2001, 10:39 +0800 GMT),
Shauna Scott wrote:
SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home
SS computer is still on 1.51).
Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Thomas,
Friday, April 20, 2001, 8:58:43 PM, you wrote:
SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home
SS computer is still on 1.51).
T Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-)
That's the joy of being the one who makes the rules for
Hello Nick,
Friday, April 20, 2001, 10:31:46 PM, you wrote:
I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the
others on this list (I'm in Edmonton).
NA Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!! :o)
Number 1, of course! (I'm not the rabid hockey fan I used to be, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
P.S.
Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the
signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message
after signing it?
Best regards
Shauna
- --
Shauna Scott
Vice President - Finance Administration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:36 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
SS get it to work with The Bat.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:46 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the
SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message
SS after signing it?
Hi Shauna,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Peter,
Saturday, April 21, 2001, 19.09.48, you wrote:
PM I'm sorry not to be able to help with your question. But I'm getting a bad
PM sig result:
PM *** PGP Signature Status: bad
Shauna stated earlier that the text was changed after the message was signed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Shauna,
Saturday, April 21, 2001, 3:36:26 PM, you wrote:
SS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SS Hash: SHA1
SS Hello All
SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
On 2001-04-21, Peter Meyns wrote:
SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous
message, the
SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the
message
SS after signing it?
PM Hi Shauna,
PM that's what PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
On 2001-04-21, George F Schoelles wrote:
GFS Download the PGP dll's from ritlabs and install them.
That did it - thanks George.
Best Regards
Shauna
- --
Shauna Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! Version 1.52 Beta/10 on
On 22-04-2001 at 00:36, Shauna Scott kindly wrote:
So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
get it to work with The Bat.
If I look under Tools-OpenPGP-Choose OpenPGP Version, the only
choices
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 01:25 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
...
SS That's what I figured, but, of course, I didn't think of it until
SS after I hit send the first time.
SS Thanks.
You're welcome.
*** PGP Signature Status: good
***
Hello All
I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP - which version should I
use? I'm running The Bat on W2K and WinNT 4.0, and most of the people I
deal with are running Outlook/Outlook Express on Win95/98.
Thanks
Shauna
--
Shauna Scott
Vice President - Finance Administration
Rocky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On April 20, 2001, at 4:54:21 PM, Shauna Scott wrote:
I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP -
Good to hear, and welcome to the PGP Community. :o)
which version should I use?
Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in
Hi Nick,
@ 9:07:40 PM on 4/20/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:
...
NA However, from what I've read, there is a current problem with the
NA PGP Plugin (which *had* worked nicely with both NAI and the CKT
NA builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest Beta's. I see you are using
NA Beta 7. :o(
The plug-ins
Hello Nick,
Thanks to you and Brian for your input.
NA Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in versions
NA 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your security needs? Do you currently have a
NA Firewall? If not, be advised that PGP 7.0.4 has a very good rules-based
NA Firewall along
On April 20, 2001, at 7:39:36 PM, Shauna Scott wrote:
I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the
others on this list (I'm in Edmonton).
Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!! :o)
Nick
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=N.J.
23 matches
Mail list logo