PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Plusnet
Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off using it. Thankyou -- Best regards Barry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version

Re: PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Robert Golovniov
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:49:47 PM, Plusnet wrote: P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off P using it. Thankyou Simply put, this is a program that allows you to 1. Digitally sign your

Re: PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello Plusnet, On 19 October 2003, at 14:49:47 (GMT +0100) you wrote: P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off P using it. Thankyou For more information (and details) you may visit www.pgpi.org

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-22 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Shauna! On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 1:25:17 AM you wrote: SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message SS after signing it? To counter

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-22 Thread Roland Burger
Hi Shauna, on Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:36:26 -0600 GMT (which was 22.04.2001, 00:36 +0100 GMT where I live) Shauna Scott wrote: So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to get it to work with The

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick! On Saturday, April 21, 2001 at 3:07:40 AM you wrote: Freeware or Payware? If you want to use it in a non-business environment stick to freeware. PGP is available in both flavours and in versions 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Thomas
Hallo Shauna, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:39:36 -0600 GMT (21/04/2001, 10:39 +0800 GMT), Shauna Scott wrote: SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home SS computer is still on 1.51). Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott
Hello Thomas, Friday, April 20, 2001, 8:58:43 PM, you wrote: SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home SS computer is still on 1.51). T Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-) That's the joy of being the one who makes the rules for

Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott
Hello Nick, Friday, April 20, 2001, 10:31:46 PM, you wrote: I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the others on this list (I'm in Edmonton). NA Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!! :o) Number 1, of course! (I'm not the rabid hockey fan I used to be, but

Re[3]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 P.S. Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message after signing it? Best regards Shauna - -- Shauna Scott Vice President - Finance Administration

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:36 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote: SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to SS get it to work with The Bat.

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:46 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote: SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message SS after signing it? Hi Shauna,

Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread 60 Gunner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Peter, Saturday, April 21, 2001, 19.09.48, you wrote: PM I'm sorry not to be able to help with your question. But I'm getting a bad PM sig result: PM *** PGP Signature Status: bad Shauna stated earlier that the text was changed after the message was signed,

Re[3]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread George F Schoelles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Shauna, Saturday, April 21, 2001, 3:36:26 PM, you wrote: SS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- SS Hash: SHA1 SS Hello All SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The

Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, On 2001-04-21, Peter Meyns wrote: SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message SS after signing it? PM Hi Shauna, PM that's what PGP

Re[4]: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Shauna Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, On 2001-04-21, George F Schoelles wrote: GFS Download the PGP dll's from ritlabs and install them. That did it - thanks George. Best Regards Shauna - -- Shauna Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! Version 1.52 Beta/10 on

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Karin Spaink
On 22-04-2001 at 00:36, Shauna Scott kindly wrote: So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to get it to work with The Bat. If I look under Tools-OpenPGP-Choose OpenPGP Version, the only choices

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 01:25 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote: ... SS That's what I figured, but, of course, I didn't think of it until SS after I hit send the first time. SS Thanks. You're welcome. *** PGP Signature Status: good ***

PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Shauna Scott
Hello All I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP - which version should I use? I'm running The Bat on W2K and WinNT 4.0, and most of the people I deal with are running Outlook/Outlook Express on Win95/98. Thanks Shauna -- Shauna Scott Vice President - Finance Administration Rocky

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On April 20, 2001, at 4:54:21 PM, Shauna Scott wrote: I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP - Good to hear, and welcome to the PGP Community. :o) which version should I use? Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Nick, @ 9:07:40 PM on 4/20/2001, Nick Andriash wrote: ... NA However, from what I've read, there is a current problem with the NA PGP Plugin (which *had* worked nicely with both NAI and the CKT NA builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest Beta's. I see you are using NA Beta 7. :o( The plug-ins

Re[2]: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Shauna Scott
Hello Nick, Thanks to you and Brian for your input. NA Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in versions NA 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your security needs? Do you currently have a NA Firewall? If not, be advised that PGP 7.0.4 has a very good rules-based NA Firewall along

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Nick Andriash
On April 20, 2001, at 7:39:36 PM, Shauna Scott wrote: I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the others on this list (I'm in Edmonton). Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!! :o) Nick =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=N.J.