Hello,
Sunday, May 06, 2001, 12:51:50 AM, you wrote:
BC> Hi Nick,
BC> @ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:
BC> ...
BC>>> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is
BC>>> now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC>>> aggravating.
NA>> Th
Hi Nick,
@ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:
...
BC>> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is
BC>> now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC>> aggravating.
NA> The 'feature' is something Maxim calls "Smart Matching", but I
NA> agree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 5, 2001, at 3:57:55 PM, Brian Clark wrote:
BC> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is now
BC> the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC> aggravating.
The 'feature' is something Maxim calls "Smar
Hi Request,
@ 4:22:26 PM on 5/5/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
rbfcu> For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is
rbfcu> [EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as Joe
rbfcu> Bloggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
...
rbfcu> Does all that make sense? :)
Yes
Hello Readers,
I've just upgraded to ver 1.52c from 1.51 and I've noticed that a
template for an address in the address book is working slightly
different with PGP.
For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as
5 matches
Mail list logo