Re[2]: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread request . batuserlist
Hello, Sunday, May 06, 2001, 12:51:50 AM, you wrote: BC> Hi Nick, BC> @ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote: BC> ... BC>>> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is BC>>> now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really BC>>> aggravating. NA>> Th

Re: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Nick, @ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote: ... BC>> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is BC>> now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really BC>> aggravating. NA> The 'feature' is something Maxim calls "Smart Matching", but I NA> agree

Re: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 5, 2001, at 3:57:55 PM, Brian Clark wrote: BC> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is now BC> the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really BC> aggravating. The 'feature' is something Maxim calls "Smar

Re: PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Request, @ 4:22:26 PM on 5/5/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... rbfcu> For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is rbfcu> [EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as Joe rbfcu> Bloggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ... rbfcu> Does all that make sense? :) Yes

PGP with 1.52c

2001-05-05 Thread request . batuserlist
Hello Readers, I've just upgraded to ver 1.52c from 1.51 and I've noticed that a template for an address in the address book is working slightly different with PGP. For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as