Hello Christian,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:45:42 +0200GMT Christian wrote:
C> I am running Window-Eyes 5.5. When i tried it about a month ago i
C> couldnt navigate since it didnt use standard controls for buttons, etc.
A friend of mine also uses Windows Eyes, so I know it is possible. She
uses TheB
Hello Christian,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 11:45:42 AM, you wrote:
> I am running Window-Eyes 5.5. When i tried it about a month ago i
> couldnt navigate since it didnt use standard controls for buttons,
> etc.
Hmmm... Not sure... The only other visually impaired person I know of
who was using TB
Hallo Christian,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:45:42 +0200GMT (16-10-2006, 19:45 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
C> Christian
C> On 2006-10-17 at 00:32 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their pos
Hallo Christian,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:24:25 +0200GMT (16-10-2006, 19:24 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
C> Hi all,
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel si
Hallo Christian,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:24:25 +0200GMT (16-10-2006, 19:24 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
C> Christian
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel
Hi,
I am running Window-Eyes 5.5. When i tried it about a month ago i couldnt
navigate since it didnt use standard controls for buttons, etc.
Many thanks,
Christian
On 2006-10-17 at 00:32 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>Hello Christian,
>
>On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:24:25 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 00:24 +070
Hello Christian,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:24:25 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 00:24 +0700 GMT),
Christian wrote:
C> I have been trying out the bat, but with some difficulties.
C> Since I am visually impaired, is it possible to change the
C> programs look to a more windows classic? The dialogs are not very
Hi all,
I have been trying out the bat, but with some difficulties.
Since I am visually impaired, is it possible to change the programs look to a
more windows classic? The dialogs are not very accessible to me with my screen
reader.
Many thanks,
Christian
___
Friday, March 28, 2003, 3:15:12 PM, Kim wrote:
K> What I'm wondering is in the "Pro" version of Kaspersky, where do they
K> classify The Bat plug-in? Is it grouped under the Mail Checker part
K> (which in Personal is just for Outlook), or is it in another element
K> of the program? Would either of
Hello Kim!
On Friday, March 28, 2003, 9:15 AM, you wrote:
K> Hi Mary and Anne,
K> ... I appreciate all of your helpful information! I have had a problem
K> with the AVG MailChecker.dll file in Kaspersky recently ...
K> ... What I'm wondering is in the "Pro" version of Kaspersky, where do
K> the
Hi Mary and Anne,
Friday, March 28, 2003, 9:21:47 AM, you wrote:
> Kim, I thought it might help you in making your comparison to know the
> subfolders that are in my Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal Pro folder.
> There are 10:
> Control Centre, Mail Checker, Monitor, Rescue Disk, Scanner, Script
>
Hello Anne and Kim!
On Friday, March 28, 2003, 4:15 AM, Anne wrote, replying to Kim:
K>> BTW, do you use the Personal or Personal Pro version of Kaspersky?
K>> If it is Pro, do you find the extras in the Pro version worth the
K>> extra $50?
A> ... For an
A> individual user I very much doubt th
Friday, March 28, 2003, 12:39:12 AM, Kim wrote:
K> Wow...I didn't realize that. I figured that my Personal license only
K> worked with the Personal version and below.
I didn't either until I tried the Pro version and realised that is
just what happens ;-) Apparently the licence is what enables t
Hi Anne,
Thursday, March 27, 2003, 5:51:27 PM, you wrote:
> Kim I don't know if you're aware but you can download an evaluation
> copy of Kaspersky Personal Pro which includes The Bat! AV plugin and
> use it with your existing KAV key. This will allow you to use KAV's AV
> plugin with TB! (but no
Thursday, March 27, 2003, 8:05:29 PM, Kim wrote:
K> I use Kaspersky Personal as my anti-virus program, and it caught
K> this worm, as I was pulling in my e-mail off the server.
Kim I don't know if you're aware but you can download an evaluation
copy of Kaspersky Personal Pro which includes The B
Hi Marck,
Thanks for the info! I feel *much* better now, and understand the
functionality of The Bat much better now too. :)
--
Best regards,
Kim
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.
Hi David,
Thursday, March 27, 2003, 3:44:32 PM, you wrote:
> With TB! Your best bet is to use the Kaspersky plugin and let TB!
> itself handle the infected mails instead of scanning durring the
> download.
I would, except that the plug-in isn't available with the $49.95
Personal version of Kasp
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, 21:33, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
K>> ... Kaspersky flagged the infected mail immediately...so quickly
K>> in fact, that I later found the message was still on the server.
K>> The only remnant on my system was in a temp file located in the
K>> Local Settings\Temp folde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 27, 2003 at 15:05:29GMT -0500 (which was 3:05 PM
where I live)
Kim wrote and made these points on the subject of "Question About The Bat
Structure and Temp Files in XP":
K> With the Bat, things seemed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kim,
@27-Mar-2003, 15:05 -0500 (20:05 UK time) Kim [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
K> ... Kaspersky flagged the infected mail immediately...so quickly
K> in fact, that I later found the message was still on the server.
K> The only remnant on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, Kim wrote...
> Also, by deleting the Bat temp file I'd mentioned above, how much
> e-mail can I expect to lose? Just the one e-mail, or all from that
> day? With Becky, I lost an entire day's e-mail when this problem
> occ
Hi All,
Being a relatively new user of The Bat (I previously used Becky Mail),
until today, I had not received a virus or worm in my e-mail. Today,
one of the users on one of my mailing lists sent an e-mail that had
the IFrame Exploit worm. I've seen this worm before, when I used
Becky. I do know
22 matches
Mail list logo
