Hello Ben,
On Monday, June 10, 2002 at 09:07:09 +0100, you wrote concerning 'The
Bat! Upgrades.':
...
I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages.
I don't feel like going to debate about this, so if you want the pro's
and con's of HTML messages look in the archives. This topic has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Kennish [BK] wrote:
...
BK I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages.
BK I am not an admirer of HTML messages (although sometimes I think I
BK would like to be able to make text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Kennish [BK] wrote:
...
BK I have never understood this complaint of HTML messages.
BK I am not an admirer of HTML messages (although sometimes I think I
BK would like to be able to make text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote:
...
I almost didn't find your text below since none of the original
message was presented as a quotation and you appended your text right
at the end of mine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote:
...
I almost didn't find your text below since none of the original
message was presented as a quotation and you appended your text right
at the end of mine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ChristopherX,
@10 June 2002, 06:54:09 -0700 (14:54 UK time) Weaven, ChristopherX
wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you have been. It's just that you need to tidy up the formatting.
Text from the original message needs to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote:
...
WC Should be better this time!?
No. It has lost it again this time, as you can well see. :-(
The formatting is the same as your last message, over-quoting and
Hi Marck,
on Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:17:38 +0100GMT (07.06.02, 18:17 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Ps. How many people are on this distribution list?
MDP About 700.
MDP moderator
MDP Very few of whom like receiving HTLM mail. ;-)
MDP /moderator
Who is
On Friday, June 7, 2002, 11:08:15 AM, David van Zuijlekom wrote:
1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather
than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program
separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at
the moment, I think some people can
Hello ChristopherX,
On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 08:20:20 -0700 , you wrote concerning 'The
Bat! Upgrades.':
...
1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather
than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program
separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ChristopherX,
@07 June 2002, 08:20:20 -0700 (16:20 UK time) Weaven, ChristopherX
wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather
than as a whole new program and then offer the
Hello Mark,
On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 09:54:24 -0700, you wrote concerning 'The
Bat! Upgrades.':
...
DvZ Talking about bandwidth: please don't post HTML-messages.
Actually, I didn't realize you could do this with TB without
explicitly attaching a file.
I didn't say you can did I? Because
--- Weaven, ChristopherX / Freitag, 07.06.2002, 17:20:20
The Bat! Upgrades.
This is a forwarded message
From: Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 7, 2002, 7:50:54 PM
Subject: Will someone please post this in TBUDL for me? TIA Re: The Bat! Upgrades
13 matches
Mail list logo
