Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-12 Thread Mitja Perko
Hello Marck, Will there be a feature to ignore by default, but load on request by let say clicking on the image while holding shift or something like that? -- Best regards, Mitja Perko Sorry to confuse. There will be a global ignore all option (don't even *think* about downloading) but if

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Mitja Perko
Hello Marck, It will never be there in that form. It's just too dangerous. I understand that support for retrieving non-sent images will be added at some point *BUT* it will only get one image at a time and prompt for permission for *each* image. This is because not all images *are* images.

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Mitja Perko
Hello Jernej, That's not the problem. The problem is, that these images can be used for tracking - spammer can embed such image in text (with unique ID), and if the server gets the request for that image ID, it can confirm that the message was read - that the e-mail address exists. There are

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]
Hi Jonathan, JA Then how would you explain viruses spreading via the .jpg and .gif JA formats? They have 'code' in the headers that the viewer (in most JA cases IE) reads and 'executes'... which causes infection. I've never heard of that and I don't think it's true; these formats have no

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]
Hi Peter, PP If you insist in the images you're free of open the HTML-page in PP your browser (which is BTW designed to display HTML pages) I sympathize with your plight of text-only e-mail, and I'd like to add that the true netpurist will only use a plain, fixed-width font. However, the Net

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]
Hi Marck, MDP erm... which it already does. I received such a mail only 30 minutes MDP ago. It was rendered perfectly. Oops! Now I see that I'd simply never had a HTML-message with the images attached. They all had links to remote images. Hence all the little red crosses! :) I've just sent

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Kurgan
JA Guess I need to give an example... Take... erm... SubSeven. Has a JA small program that 'encapsulates' files... Run it onto a .jpg file it JA increases the .jpg file by maybe 300kb... file extension is *still* JA .jpg (no hidden extensions, or anything like that), and the file is JA now

Re[2]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-10 Thread syv
On Monday, June 10, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote: New HTML engine? ,- [Allie C Martin :: New HTML engine?] | | The most protection comes from you and not your software. | Don't do anything that may compromise your machine unless | it's necessary for you to do so. | | List Moderator | TB!