Re[2]: Opinion: Blind Copy emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-25 Thread OK3
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Monday, December 25, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to OK3 on TBUDL about Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient: O Not really. RFC states that both CC and BCC recipients might be listed O or not. That only depends on

Re[2]: Opinion: Blind Copy emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-25 Thread OK3
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Monday, December 25, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to OK3 on TBUDL about Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient: TF - I am still against a warning which pops up after clicking Reply All TF and says "Are you sure Y/N?".

Re[2]: Opinion: Blind Copy emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Michael S. Greenbaum
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, George F. Schoelles wrote: I concur that this would be a cool feature. Or at least that all recipients kept their copy status. All recipients keeping their copy status would not really remove the problem. There would still be people seeing the message who

Re[2]: Opinion: Blind Copy emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi Thomas, On Sunday, December 24, 2000, 1:28:55 AM, you wrote to the list: I feel that there is a potential for problems with the current process, in which a "Reply to all" includes the original/main recipient of the email of which you received a Blind Copy MSG I really agree with this