Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-13 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Friday, September 12, 2003, 9:09:58 AM, you wrote: RO Well they had a common root, but when that common root is purged or RO manually deleted, the separate branches appear as different threads. I'm not clear on how exactly the different branches are formed when they all had a common

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-13 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Friday, September 12, 2003, 9:13:28 AM, you wrote: RO Yes it did. But most threads don't separate into that many subthreads, RO so most of the time you don't notice. Yes that seems likely. But it would only make sense if the threading works as I asked you in my previous mail.

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-13 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Saturday, September 13, 2003, 7:25:20 AM, you wrote: RO Well I'll show with a diagram: Thanks for all the trouble, Roelof :) It's clear now. I was under the impression that everything treated the original message, not the one it replied to, as its root. Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-12 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 5:56:44 AM, you wrote: RO The ZoneAlarm thread you were mentioning had lots of separate branches RO that kept going on. Since they all started with the same thread, shouldn't they have had a common root though? Or does all the Re[2]: business spoil

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-12 Thread Vishal
Hi Julian Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 6:44:58 AM, you wrote: JBL I checked the references on the broken threads that I have, and found JBL that I no longer had the messages with the MID: in my message base, JBL because they had purged. As I use a maximum limit of 200 messages for JBL

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-09 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:39:58 AM, you wrote: WM Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks WM - works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every WM time and the Re[x] is always incremented. RO I'm viewing

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-09 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello Roelof, RO Only reason I can imagine it isn't threaded at your place is that you're RO purging your messages too soon. Yes thanks for clarify. That is the reason. It is a lot of reply on messages all deleted here. It's the first time I saw this and was wondering wy without running my

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

2003-09-09 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:40:34 PM, you wrote: RO That amounts to the same. When you delete messages from the beginning RO of a thread, the rest won't thread properly. They will appear as RO separate thread, because the root they ought to have in common is RO gone. That doesn't