Re[2]: v2 compatible with older version?

2003-09-11 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh 
Hello Roelof,

RO I switched several times between the 2.00 betas and 1.62r and that
RO caused me no problems. The only difference is that 2.00 uses a

  Thanks all for the help. I can confirm the old *.exe runs just fine, and new
  maded folders are not seen just like that, but that was not importand for the
  test. As for the AV I will reply to the right thread.

-- 
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows NT 4.0 Build  1381 Service Pack 6



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: v2 compatible with older version?

2003-09-10 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh 
Hello Thomas,

TF No guarantees.

  Hmm the phrase I dont wanted to hear :)

  I can make copy of course of folders. What about registry ? Can there be
  messed up something ?  I need it for my work, so I cannot effort giving myself
  hours of problems :)

-- 
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows NT 4.0 Build  1381 Service Pack 6



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: v2 compatible with older version?

2003-09-10 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh 
Hello MAU,

M That is exactly the reason I am still on 1.62i and will not upgrade for
M some time :)

  I was so stupid g

-- 
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows NT 4.0 Build  1381 Service Pack 6



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html