Re[3]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Oleg Zalyalov
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, Wolfgang Kynast wrote to Johannes M. Posel about Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules): JMP Oh come on! What do you use? ISDN? In times of flatrates at 80 DM, I JMP can only laugh at discussions 'bout "your .sig is longer

Re[3]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Istvn Szendr
Hello Deryk, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 5:42:34 PM, you wrote to Steve Lamb: DL Hi Steve, snip Certainly reason right there to ignore it. WTF was RIT thinking when they implemented it? That energy should have been put into a decent PGP implementation. I wholeheartedly agree. DL

Re[3]: Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Gary
Hi Graham, On Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 12:07 PM, you wrote in part about "Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)": G I disagree about PGP implementation: it seems to me that PGP G messages should be seen to be the same in all e-mail clients, as G though the client was invisible