Hi Ben Mills,
On the Tuesday, May 01, 2001, U wrote:
BM> Sunday, April 29, 2001, 9:39:30 PM, you wrote:
Ai>> Is it possible to set TB not to execute attachment at all? I mean not
Ai>> to ask even...
BM> I don't believe so. Under "properties" I would suggest that you set up
BM> an attachment dir...maybe something like C:\attach. The default
BM> settings leave the attachments embedded in the mailboxes. This would
BM> be an advantage if you do backups as you wouldn't be backing up
BM> an inadvertently undeleted virus or worm. Otherwise just be careful
BM> what you execute...;)
I always am...
I'm asking because more and more people I know are using TB!
BM> This PR fiasco will haunt them for a long time. My company has over
BM> 100 computers with 30-35 running email clients (Eudora 303), I was
BM> ready to purchase a TB site license until you, I believe, posted the
And now, I'm sorry you thought that... ;(
BM> info regarding the security issue. Apparently it was kept pretty mum
BM> on this list and the sparks sure flew when you mentioned it. As it
BM> stands, I wouldn't purchase or recommend TB for all the tea in China.
BM> Ritlabs has a great deal of maturing to do before it's ready to
BM> compete with the incumbents such as Microsoft, Eudora etc.
As for security and a lot more TB! is something that I longed for some
time in the past...
The trouble is that the more people use some program it will become
more interesting for hackers/crackers and others...
I believe that ritlabs could release 1.52 some time earlier than they
ment to...
I'm just sorry that some made too much of mine comments... I just
wanted to say to be careful...
--
Till the next time, all the best...
ANT-ilic
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
