Re[2]: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-02-02 Thread Dennis W. Greer
Hello Andrew, Sunday, January 30, 2000, you wrote: Just switched to The Bat 1.39 from 1.35. In 1.35 folders with unread mail were red as is indicated now by blue folders. AKL Hello, The Bat Users! I think this question may have been asked before, but I've never read an answer. I was just

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-31 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
Hello, The Bat Users! I think this question may have been asked before, but I've never read an answer. I was just browsing RITLabs home page and noticed on their screens shots of TB, some red coloured folders along with the traditional yellow and blue ones. Anyone know the significance of

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-31 Thread Mark Worsham
Hi Nick - Saturday, January 29, 2000, 8:10:30 PM, you wrote: NA Anyway, I hope this thread keeps going on subject... I'm really anxious to NA finally know about the red folders. :o) Any of the RITLabs guys care to NA comment on it? Never mind my previous post. That's what I get for reading

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 16:29:02 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote: I think this question may have been asked before, but I've never read an answer. I was just browsing RITLabs home page and noticed on their screens shots of TB, some red coloured folders along with the traditional yellow and blue ones.

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Nick Andriash
On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 5:09:25 PM, Allie Martin wrote: That million dollar question was asked before and no one offered an answer. I'm still waiting for an answer myself. Perhaps it's a special effect? I'd be curious to know... the have it displayed in a couple of areas, so

Re: Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?

2000-01-29 Thread Nick Andriash
On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 5:48:05 PM, Allie Martin wrote: That's my postulate as to what may have happened. Hence, I think that it's always better to thread by references. :) Ok, I'll give that a try and see what difference it makes. If I remember correctly though, I tried that a while