Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread WilWilWil
Ritlabs policy is not so great... I've lost my Job last year and bought TB for manage my Job research. I'm not so happy to pay again for being up to date with TB when my order is just 3 months old ! I thing that I've not to pay for a debugging version of TB2 named TB3 ! And surtout when the bugs

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread Ludovic LE MOAL
Hi, On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 2:50:13 PM, WilWilWil wrote: I've lost my Job last year and bought TB for manage my Job research. I'm not so happy to pay again for being up to date with TB when my order is just 3 months old ! Same for me. I thing that I've not to pay for a debugging

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello WilWilWil, 01-Sep-2004 14:50, you wrote: Ritlabs policy is not so great... How do you know, they haven't sent out any information yet, or did they? I've lost my Job last year and bought TB for manage my Job research. I'm not so happy to pay again for being up to date with TB when my

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread DZ-Jay
Alexander S. Kunz wrote: As long as you don't know how your registration will be treated (maybe you get a free update because you only registered three months ago, it would be more than fair in my eyes), why do you complain? So the problem is: lack of information! Lack of information after such a

Re[2]: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread jwayne
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:59:40 PM, DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snip) DJ Sorry, but I also paid for v2.x about 4 months ago and will not update DJ to v3, ever. I will continue using v2.12 until that time when I find a DJ better program. Me too. What's keeping me back is the

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello DZ-Jay, 01-Sep-2004 21:59, you wrote: Lack of information after such a big outcry from their paying and loyal customers that we have seen during the past few days on the lists, is enough for most of us to loose faith in and respect for RitLabs. Who knows about Ritlabs intentions to

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread DZ-Jay
Alexander S. Kunz wrote: The problem may very well be that there is none. When it comes to VF's, the filtering and the macros (and the wish to have those features together in an email client), is there an alternative? Well, I use Mutt, which is a console MUA for Linux. You can run it under

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

2004-09-01 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello DZ-Jay, 01-Sep-2004 22:43, you wrote: Well, I use Mutt, which is a console MUA for Linux. Liar - Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) ... :-) The only thing that might be a problem to some is that its not point-and-clicky, i.e. its a console application, driven by keyboard