Re: Same messages?

2001-01-27 Thread Ming-Li
On Thursday, January 25, 2001, 6:13:41 PM, Marck wrote: "Aborted" ... is there a clue there? The server keeps a list of UIDLs for messages left there. I TB seems to keep the list of UIDLs it has seen and grabs any messages with a UIDL which it hasn't seen before. I can see this quite

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On 27 January 2001 at 09:42:08 -0800 (which was 17:42 where I live) Ming-Li wrote and made these points: ML Pardon my ignorance, but what is UIDL? Unique IDentifier List, a list of Unique Message Identifiers kept by the POP3

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-27 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 at 02:13:41 GMT +(which was 1/28/2001 9:13 AM where you think I live) you told to the list : ML ... usually (if not all) right after there was an aborted session. ML Since it's midday, TB shouldn't try to delete anything, and ML shouldn't have

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-25 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, January 24, 2001, 3:14:06 PM, Marck wrote: No, it doesn't apply. I have been leaving my mail on the server for 0 days (that's until midnight, same day) and have received *no* dupes under that condition. My POP3/SMTP server is on the LAN here so I have next to no connection

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-25 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Marck, Going back 18:21 24.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: lost before the DELE command was issued to remove the already received messages. This would leave the message on the server by accident and have it download a second time on the next connect and collect

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-25 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Nick, Going back 06:08 25.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: I don't believe so because I am receiving 95% of my eGroups Mailings. It's only *some* of those messages that are not getting through for some strange reason, and it's not just eGroups, but all my messages.

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-25 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Ming-Li, On 25 January 2001 at 07:51:40 -0800 (which was 15:51 where I live) Ming-Li wrote and made these points: ML ... usually (if not all) right after there was an aborted session. ML Since it's midday, TB shouldn't try to delete anything, and ML shouldn't have any problem remembering

Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Lija
Hello tbudl, Does this problem happen only to me? I'm getting messages from these lists twice! I do not keep them on the server... what's wrong with my Bat? -- Best Regards, Lija, YUPCExpert-Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get

Re[2]: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Lija
Hello Marck, On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, at 09:55:37 [GMT +] (10:55 my local time), you wrote: MDP Check the "You are subscribed as ..." line at the bottom of these MDP duplicates. You changed your subscription address - perhaps the MDP original is still a member. Nope, that's not the

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On January 24, 2001, at 12:02:45 AM, Lija Wrote: L Does this problem happen only to me? I'm getting messages from these L lists twice! I do not keep them on the server... what's wrong with my L Bat? I don't believe the fault lies with TB!. Here is

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 24 January 2001 at 09:10:10 -0800 (which was 17:10 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points: NA I don't believe the fault lies with TB!. Here is an explanation I NA received from another List I'm on: L It is lazy

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On January 24, 2001, at 9:21:47 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote: MDP It is more symptomatic of the connection with the POP3 server being MDP lost before the DELE command was issued to remove the already MDP received messages. This would leave the

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, January 24, 2001, 9:40:32 AM, Nick wrote: Ok thanks Marck for the explanation. I am going to have to run that by my Cable ISP, because not only have I been getting numerous duplicates in a cross section of the Mailing Lists I'm on, but I also have many missing posts, both

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, January 24, 2001, 9:21:47 AM, Marck wrote: It is more symptomatic of the connection with the POP3 server being lost before the DELE command was issued to remove the already received messages. This would leave the message on the server by accident and have it download a

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On 24 January 2001 at 10:46:26 -0800 (which was 18:46 where I live) Ming-Li wrote and made these points: ML Does the same apply to situation where mail is left on server (for ML 1 day in my case). I've always left my mail on server

RE: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Gary Blakely
STOP SPAMING ME WITH THESE MESSAGES !!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marck D. Pearlstone Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:14 PM To: Ming-Li on TBUDL Subject: Re: Same messages? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Gary, On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, at 16:22:19 -0800 you wrote: GB STOP SPAMING ME WITH THESE MESSAGES !!! Before you start shouting at someone, you should perhaps read to the end of one of the mails you receive and click the unsubscribe link. That should solve your problems. It's quite normal to

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Nick, Historians believe that Wed, 24 Jan 2001 at 09:40:32 GMT -0800 was when, Nick Andriash [NA] typed the following: NA Ok thanks Marck for the explanation. I am going to have to run that by NA my Cable ISP, because not only have I been getting numerous duplicates NA in a cross section

Re: Same messages?

2001-01-24 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On January 24, 2001, at 7:43:18 PM, Januk Aggarwal Wrote: JA I know the Vancouver @Home servers don't allow forwarding addresses to JA go to their accounts. Perhaps they have blackballed eGroups too. I don't believe so because I am receiving 95%