Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-07-03 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Mary, Friday, July 2, 2004, 6:40:15 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB Then Greg Strong posted this solution. And he felt so strongly about MB it that he sent it to tbudl and tbbeta also. (I know that because I'm MB subscribed to both those lists, also.) I did because I do feel strongly about it

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-07-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Greg! On Saturday, July 03, 2004, 10:18 PM, you wrote: MB Then Greg Strong posted this solution. And he felt so strongly about MB it ,,, GS I did because I do feel strongly about it (pun intended). :-) ... Confession: the pun was at first unconscious on my part, Greg--I wouldn't have

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-07-02 Thread ken green
Paul Cartwright wrote: When I'm too lazy to start a new message and find the addressbook entry, I just hit reply, remove those references, and change the subject to what I want it to say :) a cheaters way to create a new message. With TBUDL in my address book and auto-complete on, a new

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-07-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Ken! On Friday, July 02, 2004, 6:24 PM, you wrote: PC When I'm too lazy to start a new message and find the addressbook PC entry, I just hit reply, remove those references, and change the subject PC to what I want it to say :) a cheaters way to create a new message. kg With TBUDL in my

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-07-02 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, July 2, 2004, 7:24 PM, you wrote: kg With TBUDL in my address book and auto-complete on, a new message to kg the list is as simple as Ctrl+N and typing tbu in the To: field. kg Surely simpler/easier/quicker/lazier than what you describe? it can be, but I also have extenuating

Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-06-30 Thread subscriber2list
Hello Terry, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:30:26 PM, you wrote: TGM Hello subscriber2list, TGM Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 10:54:48 AM, you wrote: Again, not available to click on. TGM I think follow up would be references in version 2.00. Not sure if this is going to work, but ... I obviously

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-06-30 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:32 PM, you wrote: TGM I think follow up would be references in version 2.00. s Not sure if this is going to work, but ... I obviously hit Reply s to your original message, changed the Subject field content, selected s References from the context menu which

Re[2]: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-06-30 Thread Terry G. Munson
Hello Paul, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:51:00 PM, you wrote: Removing them also removes the thread by reference capability, which makes it like a new message, not a reply. Which, I assume, was the result wanted that started the original thread.~shrug~ -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat!

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-06-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Terry! On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:55 PM, you wrote: PC Removing them also removes the thread by reference capability, PC which makes it like a new message, not a reply. TGM Which, I assume, was the result wanted that started the original TGM thread.~shrug~ But, having identified

Re: Test using References (Follow up ) ... Changing the Subject Field Verbiage

2004-06-30 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:55 PM, you wrote: Removing them also removes the thread by reference capability, which makes it like a new message, not a reply. TGM Which, I assume, was the result wanted that started the original TGM thread.~shrug~ right. changing the subject alone is not