On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 06:21:29 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 5:26:50 AM [GMT -0500], Bjh wrote:
>
>> Very interesting, in Dialog my email came up as gobbledygook (see
>> above) but from TBudl in came through as intended as "barryh at
>> nospam dot kentra dot co dot u
On Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 5:26:50 AM [GMT -0500], Bjh wrote:
> Very interesting, in Dialog my email came up as gobbledygook (see
> above) but from TBudl in came through as intended as "barryh at
> nospam dot kentra dot co dot uk"
That's by design. The Gmane server scrambles/obfuscates any
On Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 5:22:16 AM [GMT -0500], Bjh wrote:
> OK, if I've solved this mystery then everyone will see this post via
> Gmane which apparently requires genuine email addresses so my
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't allowed.
Again, by design. GMane will not accept messages from inv
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:22:16 +, BJH wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:42:08 +0100, daRkSidE wrote:
>
>> In data Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:26:30 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
>>
>>> d> You should wait for gmane authorization to post and you should receive
>>> d> by email, IIRC.
>>> But I've
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:42:08 +0100, daRkSidE wrote:
> In data Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:26:30 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
>
>> d> You should wait for gmane authorization to post and you should receive
>> d> by email, IIRC.
>> But I've already had that about three weeks ago?
>
> I can't ex
In data Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:26:30 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
> d> You should wait for gmane authorization to post and you should receive
> d> by email, IIRC.
> But I've already had that about three weeks ago?
I can't explain, I don't know exactly gmane mechanism. It was a long
tim
Hello Barry,
Thursday, February 3, 2005, 8:26:30 AM, you wrote:
BH> Hello daRkSidE,
BH> Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 12:45:13 PM, you wrote:
d>> In data Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:39:14 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
>>> Roelof kindly responded so I replied to him and the rest of the
>>>
Hello daRkSidE,
Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 12:45:13 PM, you wrote:
d> In data Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:39:14 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
>> Roelof kindly responded so I replied to him and the rest of the
>> newsgroup using my client (Dialog) but the reply didn't appear,
>> s
In data Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:39:14 +, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
> Roelof kindly responded so I replied to him and the rest of the
> newsgroup using my client (Dialog) but the reply didn't appear,
> so I'm posting again using TB.
> Am I doing something wrong?
You should
Op Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:39:14 + schreef Barry Higginbottom:
> I prefer to use Dialog to follow newsgroups and use the Gmane
> server for the The Bat lists.
Same here. I have had no problems today.
--
Adriana,
[using The Bat! 3.0.2.8 on Win XP Pro for mail and 40tudeDialog for
usenet]
_
Dear TB Users
I prefer to use Dialog to follow newsgroups and use the Gmane
server for the The Bat lists.
This morning I noticed that I couldn't post so I sent a message
via TB.
Roelof kindly responded so I replied to him and the rest of the
newsgroup using my clien
11 matches
Mail list logo
