On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 11:06:54 AM, Roman Katzer wrote:
[snips]
Roman It's hardly a year since version 2 came out and I was wondering why there
Roman were so few minor releases in the last weeks. Now RITLabs is releasing
Roman version 3 without functioning IMAP support in V2
Hello Roman,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:06:54 AM, you wrote:
RK This is a slap in the face of all users - to get bugs fixed now (in
RK software you paid for) you have to get the next version. I suppose version
RK 4 will be out six months from now, and version 5 three months after that?
Hello M,
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 8:46:07 AM, you wrote:
MicCullen Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment
No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can get. :-(
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.12.03
Mark,
On 01-09-2004 10:06, you [MP] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MP No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can
MP get. :-(
Please elaborate!
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 2.13 Lucky Beta/8 /thebat version
os
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 4:06:51 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
[snips]
MicCullen Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment
Mark No it isn't. Most comments are showing how low reasoning power can get. :-(
If you're a blind defender of the appalling way that this process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 14:46:07 +0800,
@ @ when M i c C u l l e n wrote:
Reading the beta list is reasonably entertaining at the moment :-)
temptation -- (the desire to have or do something that you know you
I can't believe it.
It's hardly a year since version 2 came out and I was wondering why there
were so few minor releases in the last weeks. Now RITLabs is releasing
version 3 without functioning IMAP support in V2 (promised) and a whole
load of new, unfixed bugs introduced.
This is a slap in the
7 matches
Mail list logo