Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-05 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Marck, On 16:43 04.03.2004, you [Marck D Pearlstone] wrote... So, spam is still not going to get through! I think they have it covered pretty well. Well, as I said, I dislike TDMA, but that's more of a personal approach ;) Absolutely! Well, I think it's up to the mods. We might try?

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-04 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Marck, On 21:51 03.03.2004, you [Marck D Pearlstone] wrote... Have you checked out GMane? Are the flames about GMane. It seems to answer all of the criticisms you raise. http://www.gmane.org/ I checked there site. Well, we might try, allthough I dislike TDMA stuf, especially in

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Johannes, @4-Mar-2004, 16:01 +0100 (04-Mar 15:01 UK time) Johannes Posel [JP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: JP Honestly, we might still get spammed, because even with TDMA, JP they forward mails to the real addresses, only that the spam is JP addressed to the forwarding mail

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-03 Thread Joseph N.
Johannes, On Wednesday, March 03, 2004, Johannes Posel wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: receive some spam at the address I use for public newsgroups, but it's easily filtered; and I receive no spam from, and see no spamming posts on, newsgroups on secure servers that require

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-03 Thread Joseph N.
On Tuesday, March 02, 2004, Dave Gorman wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: if TB is used as a news reader with MyGate or other such software, then users may start demanding features which are more news reader specific, therefore changing the focus of development away from priorities more

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-03 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Allie, On 11:52 01.03.2004, you [Allie Martin] wrote... The news group will be simply a mirror or the mailing list and not a Now this would be the *wrongest* thing to do! It combines the evils[1] of both systems! Try to ask in Usenet about gates, and you will be flamed :)) Cheers,

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-03 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Joseph, On 17:26 03.03.2004, you [Joseph N.] wrote... You're confusing newsgroups with the Usenet. Actually I was not, I was just catching up mails slowly. At least in de.*, there's a The Bat newsgroup (de.alt.comp.the-bat) alreadyl, so that's where I was misleaded. newsgroup can be

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Johannes, @3-Mar-2004, 18:57 +0100 (03-Mar 17:57 UK time) Johannes Posel [JP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie: The news group will be simply a mirror or the mailing list and not a JP Now this would be the *wrongest* thing to do! It combines the JP evils[1] of both systems! Try to

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-03 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello Allie, on Monday, March 1, 2004, 4:52:05 AM, Allie Martin wrote: The news group will be simply a mirror or the mailing list and not a separate entity. Messages on the news server will be only messages sent to the mailing list. The news server mirror will be added as a means for those

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Deborah W
On Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 5:01:28 AM, Greg Strong wrote: GS I don't know about that. I'm sure the moderators have specific GS count. IIRC I've been on this list for two years. The volume has GS ALWAYS been high. People think this list is high-volume? I'm on lists that generate 300 posts per day

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Anne
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, 6:00:39 PM, Allie wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A Even moreso there's the concern for e-mail address harvesting by A spammers. This would be my major worry Allie, as it's extremely common to have e-mail addies harvested from open newsgroups. I'd hate to

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Anne
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 11:08:33 AM, Marck wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M I believe that Gmane uses a similar technology to our own list M archive. Email addresses are obfuscated wherever they appear. None M are published. See these: They do on the web interface - I was there on

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Anne
On Monday, March 1, 2004, 12:14:49 AM, Allie wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A Both addresses in the mail text and addresses in the headers are A encrypted. But not by default Allie - it's something that has to be specifically set up for the whole list by the admin for maximum

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Anne, @2-Mar-2004, 08:54 Anne [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: A Both addresses in the mail text and addresses in the headers are A encrypted. A But not by default Allie - it's something that has to be A specifically set up for the whole list by the admin for maximum A protection. ...

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Dave Gorman
Hello Greg, Monday, March 1, 2004, 7:35:39 PM, you wrote: What I don't want to see is a change of focus in development. DG Granted, I've been skimming most of the posts in this thread after the DG first several dozen, so maybe I missed something. No, I don't think you missed much. I merely

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Anne, On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:55:08 + GMT (02/03/2004, 14:55 +0700 GMT), Anne wrote: They do on the web interface - I was there on the Smoothwall ng a few days back, and out of interest checked out how the e-mail addies were shown. They appear encrypted on the list and when you click

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Carsten, On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:45:24 +0100 GMT (02/03/2004, 02:45 +0700 GMT), Carsten Thönges wrote: How about when posting to a mailing list which is mirrored in the Usenet? You mustn't confuse Gmane with Usenet. These are two different things. Please elaborate. Simply put, I

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Sean H.
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 10:45:59 AM, Thomas wrote: You mustn't confuse Gmane with Usenet. These are two different things. TF Please elaborate. Simply put, I thought that what I access with NNTP TF is the Usenet. I'm not sure what the exact definition of Usenet is, but I think the difference

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-02 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Joseph, On 05:36 02.03.2004, you [Joseph N.] wrote... receive some spam at the address I use for public newsgroups, but it's easily filtered; and I receive no spam from, and see no spamming posts on, newsgroups on secure servers that require authentication. Sorry. It doesn't depend on

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Allie Martin
Martin Schneider, [MS] wrote: MS So I would be sad if this mailing-list would be less in usage MS because a newsgroup is available also for many beginners who are MS glad to be able to write and receive a mail. The news group will be simply a mirror or the mailing list and not a separate entity.

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Deborah W
On Monday, March 1, 2004, 10:52:05 AM, Allie Martin wrote: AM The news group will be simply a mirror or the mailing list and not AM a separate entity. Messages on the news server will be only AM messages sent to the mailing list. The news server mirror will be AM added as a means for those who

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 JN I have preferred this ML format to a newsgroup format, but IMO the JN volume of this list has now exceeded a busy person's ability to handle JN it in mailing list format. FWIW, I access news using TB! and MyGate so would see no change or benefit

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Deborah, @1-Mar-2004, 11:37 Deborah W [DW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: DW I can't really see what advantage NNTP has over the TBUDL archive. DW It's not as though NNTP provides readability that some people don't DW have - if you have internet access, you have a browser. This is a far

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Martin, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:22:52 -0600 GMT (01/03/2004, 11:22 +0700 GMT), Martin Schneider wrote: Well, for posting to Newsgroups I use an account of www.spammotel.com. How about when posting to a mailing list which is mirrored in the Usenet? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:14:53 + GMT (01/03/2004, 19:14 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Any fear of posting is borne of irrationality and under education :-). Thanks for that. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Der Angeklagte

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Allie Martin
Stuart Hemming wrote: FWIW, I access news using TB! and MyGate so would see no change or benefit from moving from a ML to NNTP. You see no benefit since using TB! for news makes you lose all the news specific functionality that you'd have at your disposal if you were to use a specialized

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Deborah, On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:37:58 + GMT (01/03/2004, 18:37 +0700 GMT), Deborah W wrote: I can't really see what advantage NNTP has over the TBUDL archive. Well, I see a point: I cannot reply to postings when reading the archive. But that's not my side of the fence... -- Cheers,

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Martin, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:53:58 -0600 GMT (01/03/2004, 10:53 +0700 GMT), Martin Schneider wrote: If others use a news2mail-gateway then anyway they use The Bat and it doesn't make any difference if we use a mailing group or a newsgroup. It does, because I use another email address

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:30:47 -0500 GMT (01/03/2004, 00:30 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: Sure, but one shouldn't force someone to join a mailing list if they don't want. The best arrangement is one of choice. A choice I would suggest is a seperate TB newsgroup rather than a

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:56:01 +0100 GMT (29/02/2004, 22:56 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: I use MyGate as well. I would wish for an option in TB to not create message ID. Account level would be fine for me, as I have a dedicated account for NGs. I don't quite understand what you mean, why

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Monday, March 1, 2004, 17:12:40, Allie Martin wrote: There are a few yahoogroups lists that I no longer read since I'm really not interested in most of the traffic and I can't be bothered with downloading all those messages and having to mark most of the threads read etc. just to find

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas, When you write a message, new or reply, TB will create a mid based on the domain of the email address set up in your account properties. For email, that is fine. Right. For newsgroups, however, the domain of the mid must belong to yourself, or it must be given by the

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Monday, March 1, 2004, 17:39:48, Thomas Fernandez wrote: For newsgroups, however, the domain of the mid must belong to yourself, or it must be given by the receiving newsserver. There are websites for the reasons, but I only know some in German, I am sure somebody will help out with

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Thomas Fernandez writes: Martin Schneider wrote: Well, for posting to Newsgroups I use an account of www.spammotel.com. How about when posting to a mailing list which is mirrored in the Usenet? You mustn't confuse Gmane with Usenet. These are two different things. Carsten --

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread MAU
Hello Jernej, The general rule is, that the domain must exist, but nothing critical will happen if it doesn't. I can confirm that it doesn't :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Dave Gorman
Hello Greg, Monday, March 1, 2004, 5:30:20 PM, you wrote: In my mind why would someone want to read about an email program from a news reader? I think Allie has covered answers to this. However, in my mind the question is not so much why would they want to as it is why not let them? What I

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Urban
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, Greg Strong wrote: In my mind why would someone want to read about an email program from a news reader? Why not? Sometimes I learn about computer programs by interpreting black figures attached to a piece of boiled, bleached and very dead tree. :-) -- Urban Magnet:

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Urban
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, Greg Strong wrote: In my mind why would someone want to read about an email program from a news reader? Why not? Sometimes I learn about computer programs by interpreting black figures attached to a piece of boiled and very dead bleached tree. -- Urban Magnet:

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Joseph N.
Urban, On Saturday, February 28, 2004, Urban wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I agree. It is about an e-mail client after all... U Totally agree with you Peter. It would be rather silly if TB* went U NNTP: To get help on how to use mail, you first have to learn how to U usenet... I do not

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Urban
Monday, March 1, 2004, Thomas Fernandez wrote: There are websites for the reasons, but I only know some in German, I am sure somebody will help out with English sites. Haven't found any, but going to http://sites.inka.de/ancalagon/fqdn/fqdn.php3 and filling in the form was easy enough. --

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Urban
Monday, March 1, 2004, MAU wrote: I can confirm that it doesn't It could. You can't guarantee that it's unique, so there is a possibility that someone generates a message that has the same message-id as the one you sent. -- Urban Smoking kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-03-01 Thread Urban
Monday, March 1, 2004, Jernej Simoni wrote: if you register with individual.net, they let you use a certain domain (forgot which one, you can read their FAQ) No need to. It's ID-#.user.uni-berlin.de where # is your user-id. -- Urban Mushrooms always grow in damp places and so they

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas, Judging from the home page, you are a very good graphic designer, a real artist I'd say. ;-) That means you liked my flash introduction, right? Thanks ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, Shoe-horning is a loose way of saying that you go around the bend to make something do what it isn't really designed to do. OK, thanks for the explanation. In this context you install MyGate and create sophisticated filters that probably required some serious thought in their

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Thomas, @29-Feb-2004, 13:12 +0700 (29-Feb 06:12 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... not on news groups that mask addresses. gmane does this and even has options to dump all posts from specific people. So if we were to echo to gmane, you could

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 6:08 AM, you wrote: ... not on news groups that mask addresses. gmane does this and even has options to dump all posts from specific people. So if we were to echo to gmane, you could optionally not let your messages appear there and your address would be

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 12:10 AM, you wrote: Oh boy! Am I getting old! I forgot that my Ignore function is already described in a personal web. Go to www.rancho-k.com TF Judging from the home page, you are a very good graphic designer, a TF real artist I'd say. ;-) I tried it in IE

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread MAU
Hello Paul, I tried it in IE and Firefox, and all I got was 3 lines: Miguel's TB Utilities Thread Ignore function. Manual Re-Thread function That is all there is to it. You may get some popups because the page is actually a personal one at Wanadoo and they have all kind of popups.

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Allie Martin
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote: PC I think you have probably touched on the most serious security PC issues with a newsgroup, so is there a downside to using Gmane? The main downsides I can think of are the following: a) It's a free service so we'll be at the mercy of the little things that can go

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 13:09:47, Allie Martin wrote: c) When replying to posts, you'll have to reply to the list address and not the news server since sending messages to the server will be barred for security reasons. AFAIK, GMane sends the newsgroup messages as if they originated

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 7:03 AM, you wrote: I tried it in IE and Firefox, and all I got was 3 lines: Miguel's TB Utilities Thread Ignore function. Manual Re-Thread function M That is all there is to it. You may get some popups because the page is M actually a personal one at

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Allie, Sunday, February 29, 2004, 6:09:47 AM, Allie Martin wrote: AM b) Despite the reassurances, there'll likely be some who will not want AM to have their posts mirrored to the server and archived there. They'll AM be able to easily do so by including the X-No-Archive header in their AM

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 07:09:47 -0500 GMT (29/02/2004, 19:09 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: PC If not, why can't it be setup and give it a try? We thought we'd air the suggestion and see what happens over the ensuing week. Thomas is the first who has raised strong objection. We're

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:56:59 +0100 GMT (29/02/2004, 17:56 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: Why? TB _is_ dealing with e-mail anyway, and it is not asked to do anything that it can't do with normal e-mail from a mailing list. MyGate, a separate program, not even a TB plugin, does all the nasty

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:39:53 +0100 GMT (29/02/2004, 17:39 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: Judging from the home page, you are a very good graphic designer, a real artist I'd say. ;-) That means you liked my flash introduction, right? Well... no beer this time! ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Allie Martin
Greg Strong, [GS] wrote: GS This maybe something I choose to do with TB to opt out. So make GS sure you make the announcement if and when you go live. Yes. We'll not be announcing that we have gone live. We'll be announcing that we'll be going live and discussing how to add the X-No-Archive

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Thomas Fernandez writes: No thanks, I don't want this ML mirrored on the usenet and have this email address burnt as well. I don't know how secure a secure newsserver is and don't care to try. (If you are talking about gmane ...) Why don't you just visit gmane.org and read a bit ...? This

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Allie Martin writes: Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote: If not, why can't it be setup and give it a try? We thought we'd air the suggestion and see what happens over the ensuing week. Why don't we start with TBTECH or TBDEV and see? Carsten --

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi MAU, on Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:02:52 +0100GMT, you wrote: I'll look for your post in eager anticipation! :-) M Oh boy! Am I getting old! I forgot that my Ignore function is already M described in a personal web. Go to www.rancho-k.com Thanks a lot Miguel for the good idea of using PowerPro. I

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 10:07 AM, you wrote: If not, why can't it be setup and give it a try? We thought we'd air the suggestion and see what happens over the ensuing week. CT Why don't we start with TBTECH or TBDEV and see? because I'm not subscribed to those lists??G -- Paul

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas, I use MyGate as well. I would wish for an option in TB to not create message ID. Account level would be fine for me, as I have a dedicated account for NGs. I don't quite understand what you mean, why not create message ID? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Allie, Sunday, February 29, 2004, 8:52:42 AM, Allie Martin wrote: AM Those reading via NNTP will have to use their news client to reply. AM However, they'll be sending their reply to the list address and not AM the news server. References should be preserved in that way. If references are

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 11:04 AM, you wrote: GS I subsequently learned that all I had to do GS was put a dummy email address in Agent, and only provide the REAL email GS address in the news server's authentication login which was never part GS of the headers. Mind you this was after

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Greg, On 28 February 2004, 09:45 -0600 ( 15:45 local time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JN What do others think of managing the volume of this list? GS No. TB is an email program, and being on a mail list facilitates GS

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Allie Martin
Martin Webster, [MW] wrote: MW I agree. I originally subscribed to the list because I wanted to MW learn more about TB! Opting for a news group could deter new users MW from joining our community. Sure, but one shouldn't force someone to join a mailing list if they don't want. The best

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, On 29 February 2004, 12:30 -0500 ( 17:30 local time) Allie Martin [AM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AM These lists will always be available. We're simply considering AM mirroring the posts to an NNTP server where those who wish to

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Allie, Sunday, February 29, 2004, 11:35:58 AM, Allie Martin wrote: AM The domain names within headers may be obfuscated as well. ^ key operative word -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Allie Martin
Roelof Otten, [RO] wrote: AM Yes. We'll not be announcing that we have gone live. We'll be AM announcing that we'll be going live and discussing how to add the AM X-No-Archive header for those who wish to do so. RO You mean like this? I saw this in your message header: X-No-Archive: yes Yes!

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, Allie Martin wrote... I'm wondering if they're properly informed of how that system deals with their concerns of privacy and spamming. Because you can get a spam bot to join a newsgroup, fetch say a months worth of emails, and harvest away, while mailing list

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Allie Martin
Jonathan Angliss, [JA] wrote: JA Because you can get a spam bot to join a newsgroup, fetch say a JA months worth of emails, and harvest away, while mailing list JA archives are a lot harder to work on, having to request many pages JA usually. Just a thought :) The obfustication is done on the JA

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello Joseph, on Saturday, February 28, 2004, 9:10:11 AM, Joseph N. wrote: It would be easier to scan, store, read, and otherwise manage the growing volume if it were on the Usenet. What do others think of managing the volume of this list? Why it would be easier to scan, stor, read and so

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-29 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello Greg, on Sunday, February 29, 2004, 10:04:01 AM, Greg Strong wrote: I subsequently learned that all I had to do was put a dummy email address in Agent, and only provide the REAL email address in the news server's authentication login which was never part of the headers. Mind you this

Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Joseph N.
I have preferred this ML format to a newsgroup format, but IMO the volume of this list has now exceeded a busy person's ability to handle it in mailing list format. It would be easier to scan, store, read, and otherwise manage the growing volume if it were on the Usenet. What do others think of

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Joseph, Saturday, February 28, 2004, 9:10:11 AM, Joseph N. wrote: JN What do others think of managing the volume of this list? No. TB is an email program, and being on a mail list facilitates learning new features. This has been brought up several times in the past, and has never gotten

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Joseph, on Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:10:11 -0600GMT, you wrote: JN I have preferred this ML format to a newsgroup format, but IMO the JN volume of this list has now exceeded a busy person's ability to handle JN it in mailing list format. It would be easier to scan, store, read, JN and otherwise

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Jurgen, on Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:01:41 +0100GMT, you wrote: I don't have a subscription including newsgroups... and the few newsgroups servers that I was able to find don't have lots of stuff on them... so I stopped with that. Have a look at this one. It is for free after subscription.

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Joseph, I have preferred this ML format to a newsgroup format, but IMO the volume of this list has now exceeded a busy person's ability to handle it in mailing list format. It would be easier to scan, store, read, and otherwise manage the growing volume if it were on the Usenet. What

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Jurgen, and the few newsgroups servers that I was able to find don't have lots of stuff on them... so I stopped with that. Have you tried http://news.cis.dfn.de/ ? Its one of the best. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Winamp Playing: Kenny

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Peter, Saturday, February 28, 2004, 10:14:27 AM, Peter Meyns wrote: PM I even installed MyGate to use The Bat! for newsgroups too. :-) When I'm reading newsgroups I read a news reader. TB is not a news reader. At least not yet. I can see where this thread is going so I might just as well

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, I don't have problems with it. Particularly with The Bat! it is so easy to hit ctrl+shift+M to mark the whole thread read. I even installed MyGate to use The Bat! for newsgroups too. :-) One of these days I'm going to have to explain what I do to Ignore and Watch threads. Works

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, I agree. It is about an e-mail client after all... Why do Ritlabs and some people use and support a web forum then? TB is not a web browser either, at least yet ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Winamp Playing: Jazzmasters -

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Greg, When I'm reading newsgroups I read a news reader. TB is not a news reader. At least not yet. Aside of the protocols used, SMTP/POP or NNTP, what is the big difference between a newsgroup and a mailing list? :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat!

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Jurgen, (But I still don't want the lists to appear there!) OK with me. I have already said I don't really care. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Winamp Playing: Aaron Neville - Can't Stop My Heart From Loving You (Smoothjazz.com - The

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi MAU, on Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:31:15 +0100GMT, you wrote: I agree. It is about an e-mail client after all... M Why do Ritlabs and some people use and support a web forum then? TB is M not a web browser either, at least yet ;-) I really don't know. I have only come across this forum a couple

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi MAU, on Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:28:52 +0100GMT, you wrote: M One of these days I'm going to have to explain what I do to Ignore and M Watch threads. Works for both newsgroups and mailing lists :) I'll look for your post in eager anticipation! :-) -- Cheers Peter When we talk to God it's

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Oliver Wolfram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [Samstag, 28. Februar 2004, 17:14:27]: I don't have problems with it. Particularly with The Bat! it is so easy to hit ctrl+shift+M to mark the whole thread read. I even installed MyGate to use The Bat! for newsgroups too. :-) Hi Peter, OH-MY-GOD. Thank you so much for

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Frank J de Bruin
Joseph N. wrote: JN It would be easier to scan, store, read, and otherwise manage the JN growing volume if it were on the Usenet. What do others think of JN managing the volume of this list? I welcome the idea. I prefer a newsgroup to a mailing list. My newsreader is better equipped to handle

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Mark Wieder
Shouldn't this be in the FAQ by now so we can just put it to rest? -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread allie_M
MAU wrote: Aside of the protocols used, SMTP/POP or NNTP, what is the big difference between a newsgroup and a mailing list? :) You're not using a true news client so the main differences aren't apparent to you. Two major differences come to mind: a) When I wish to review newsgroup posts I

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jurgen, On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:01:41 +0100 GMT (28/02/2004, 23:01 +0700 GMT), Jurgen Haug wrote: and in addition I don't have a subscription including newsgroups... http://www.news.individual.de will give you a free subscription to the newsserver at TU Berlin. and the few newsgroups

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Joseph N.
Mark, On Saturday, February 28, 2004, Mark Wieder wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MW Shouldn't this be in the FAQ by now so we can just put it to rest? No, it shouldn't. See, in particular, the responses by Allie mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and Frank de Bruin mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], both of whom

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Mau, @28-Feb-2004, 17:31 +0100 (28-Feb 16:31 UK time) MAU [M] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: I agree. It is about an e-mail client after all... M Why do Ritlabs and some people use and support a web forum then? That's an easy one. Having a forum scores points on TUCOWS rating

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Joseph N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have preferred this ML format to a newsgroup format, but IMO the volume of this list has now exceeded a busy person's ability to handle it in mailing list format. It would be easier to scan, store, read, and otherwise manage the growing volume if it

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Allie Martin
Marck D Pearlstone, [MDP] wrote: MDP Although newsgroups have their benefits, I'm still reluctant to MDP reflect the list that way while there is strong resistance. I MDP don't see anyone threatening to leave *unless* it becomes a MDP newsgroup or gains a newsgroup echo. So a mailing list it will

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Frank J de Bruin
Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Although newsgroups have their benefits, I'm still reluctant to MDP reflect the list that way while there is strong resistance. I don't MDP see anyone threatening to leave *unless* it becomes a newsgroup or MDP gains a newsgroup echo. So a mailing list it will stay

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Fj, @28-Feb-2004, 19:02 +0100 (28-Feb 18:02 UK time) Frank J de Bruin [FDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP anyone threatening to leave *unless* it becomes a newsgroup or MDP ... a mailing list it will stay for the present and for the MDP foreseeable future... FDB Threatening

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, 18:47:41, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Although newsgroups have their benefits, I'm still reluctant to reflect the list that way while there is strong resistance. I don't see anyone threatening to leave *unless* it becomes a newsgroup or gains a newsgroup echo. So

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jernej, @28-Feb-2004, 19:22 +0100 (28-Feb 18:22 UK time) Jernej Simoni [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: JS Have you looked at http://gmane.org ? Yes I have. And someone put TBUDL up there once before. And people left and complained very loudly. So we removed TBUDL from gmane.

Re[2]: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread Frank J de Bruin
Marck D Pearlstone wrote: FDB Threatening to leave is not a very strong argument, is it? MDP Of course it is - when it's existing members saying no to a MDP newsgroup. It's called not alienating the existing user base. MDP Threatening to leave if a certain change *does* take place is a fair MDP

Re: Time for a Newsgroup?

2004-02-28 Thread MAU
Hello Marck, That's an easy one. Having a forum scores points on TUCOWS rating system. I didn't know that. It's still rubbish though. I only looked at it once when I learnt about it, and never again. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7

  1   2   >