Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello jmtb,

On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 02:42:21 + GMT (06/09/2005, 09:42 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 . . . If, in addition, his email provider also offers SSL, this has nothing 
 to do with whether he connects via dial-up or broadband.

jan Sadly, it does.  ATT insists upon it a secure connection for
jan broadband, whereas they do not for dial-up.  It's an extra
jan defense against spammers using their system, they say.

Well. In that  case, you need to switch to SSL in addition to what I
recommended. Hope all of your email prviders support that.

--

Cheers,
Thomas.

News article: A hole has been found in the fence surrounding the
Happydale Nudist Colony. Police are looking into it.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello jmtb,

On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 02:34:08 + GMT (06/09/2005, 09:34 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

jan ATT -- worldnet.att.net -- requires these port setting for DSL.  It also
jan requires a secure connection through SSL. (I'm hoping, when I
jan upgrade, that it will accept TLS

I saw some message of your posted with a TB v2 version. So you seem
have to figured it out. If you cheated and posted those messages with
dial-up (I didn't check), you might have to upgrade TB to comply with
ATT's policy.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Sorry, Officer, I didn't realize my radar detector wasn't plugged
in.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread Mark Wieder
jmtb-

If all you need is TLS, then you should be OK. I'm using roughly the
same vintage and I can connect to my gmail account using TLS. OTOH I
seem to remember some TLS problems with some earlier versions, so this
may or may not work out. My settings are:

SMTP:
secure to regular port (STARTTLS) : 587
Perform SMTP authentication: RFC 2554
Use settings of mail retrieval
Use POP before SMTP authentication

POP:
secure to dedicated port (TLS) : 995
authentication : regular

Other than that, try installing stunnel.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jerrold,

On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:53:56 +GMT (5-9-2005, 4:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

JM I upgraded from my dial-up connection (worldnet.att.net) to DSL
JM with the same ISP.  Everything works fine -- except for TB.  It
JM won't connect.  I'm using TB version 148e, which has been doing
JM just fine for me, sorting and handling all incoming and outgoing
JM corresondece flawlessly, along with my 50K archived message.  Did until 
now, that is.

1.48e is rather an oldie. You should upgrade to 1.62, that's running
under the same license that you've got now and it's still available
for download at the Ritlabs site: 
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php

JM I changed outgoing port settings from 25 to 465, incoming from
JM 110 to 995, as instructed, fussed with all other of what seemed to
JM be reasonable possibilities, with the best guesses of ATT tech
JM support, which doesn't know TB.  That support seems baffled that
JM there is no SSL setting in this version of TB

These days TB has got TLS, but I really don't know when that got
implemented, my best guess is to try 1.62, that was the Christmas
release for 2002 and is therefore about two years more recent than
1.48e (I'm not absolutely sure about that time, only thing I know for
sure was that 1.53d was current on 4 Sepetember 2001) And that's quite
some development time.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Say it with flowers.  Give her a Triffid

The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpygEcJQFkGa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Mod: Cut mark (was: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail))

2005-09-05 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jerrold,

On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:53:56 +GMT (5-9-2005, 4:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

JM (Webmail is agonizing.)

JM Many thanks.

JM Jerry 

JM 
JM Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Jerrold.

  '

Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
the signature and list footers since everything below and including
the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting.

You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in
your templates.

Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any
difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being
courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added
to your signature by the list server.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.
/moderator

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Death to all moderators..AAACK!!!...W$%x NO CARRIER


pgptkMvacFKC6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jerry,

On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:53:56 + GMT (05/09/2005, 09:53 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

jan I upgraded from my dial-up connection (worldnet.att.net) to DSL
jan with the same ISP.  Everything works fine -- except for TB.  It
jan won't connect.

I read that you now connect using your DSL connection instead of
dial-up. This is the way you connect to the internet per se.

DSL = Digital Subscriber Line.

jan I changed outgoing port settings from 25 to 465, incoming from
jan 110 to 995, as instructed,

This has to do with SSL, which is a secure protocol. It actually has
nothing to do with whether you connect via dial-up or DSL. Change the
ports back to 110 and 25.

SSL = Secure Socket Layer.

In the main menu, go to Options / Network Administration. Your setting
shows Dial-Up, you need to switch it to LAN or manual connection.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

13. Los Angeles's full name is El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reina
de los Angeles de Porciuncula and can be abbreviated to 3.63% of
its size,L.A.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Greg,

On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:43:37 -0500 GMT (05/09/2005, 21:43 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:

 In the main menu, go to Options / Network Administration. Your setting
 shows Dial-Up, you need to switch it to LAN or manual connection.

GS You're probably correct on this

I hope so, because this was the solution for me when I switched from
dial-up to broadband back in Taiwan. That was a cable connection, not
DSL, but I would think it's the same issue here.

GS as well as changing the 'connection' type to one of the 'TLS'
GS options.

That has to do with the email provider, not the internet connection.
Many email providers (such as GMX) provide both plain as well as
secure access. Since the plain access worked with his dial-up, it
should work with broadband as well. If, in addition, his email
provider also offers SSL, this has nothing to do with whether he
connects via dial-up or broadband.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: A detective can only
solve a case once he has been fired from his job.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Greg,

On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:33:48 -0500 GMT (05/09/2005, 22:33 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:

GS Well according to the original message it seems that the provider's
GS support was asking about SSL.  See quote below:

GS ,- [ per
GS mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GS | That support seems baffled that there is no SSL setting in this version
GS | of TB (at least that I can find), which seems to be required in order for 
TB
GS | to work with ATT DSL.
GS `-

Please don't use boxquoting. It messes up everything.

However, I think the OP was confused about DSL and SSL.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: When foreigners are
alone, they all prefer to speak English to each other.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
  That support seems baffled that there is no SSL setting
  in this version of TB (at least that I can
  find), which seems to be required in order for TB to work with
  ATT DSL.
 
 The fact that you do not have SSL may be the problem. Is the SSL the
 required connection type?

It is the problem.  Yes, it is a required connection type.
 
 You have obviously been a TB user for some time with 1.48e. It sounds
 like you have already looked in Account | Properties (Shft+Ctrl+P). I
 don't know if UI is still the same in v3, but under 'Transport' you
 should have a drop down list box for 'Connection'. If there is no
 'SSL' option is there a 'TLS' option?

Unfortunately, there is neither an SSL nor a TLS option there, not in TB 1.48e, 
anyway.   

 So if you do not have either as a connection option, I would upgrade.
 Anyhow it is about time.

Thanks for the try. 

While 1.48e has been doing everything I need and want it to till now, I don't 
at all mind upgrading -- assuming I get the upgrade to work with DSL 
connection, and assuming I can migrate all my sorting rules, folder structures, 
and 50K of archived messages, about 40% of which are business related and which 
I need.  I understand that I have to move everything to midway version that 
will act as interface between what I now have and more recent versions.  

As I said, I don't really need any more functionality than I already had in TB, 
and down want to get into problematic upgrades.  Anyone recommend a 
particularly stable  and bug free version?

Many thanks.

--

Be well,
Jerry



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
Mark,

 If all you need is TLS, then you should be OK. I'm using roughly the
 same vintage and I can connect to my gmail account using TLS. OTOH I
 seem to remember some TLS problems with some earlier versions, so this
 may or may not work out. My settings are:
 
 SMTP:
 secure to regular port (STARTTLS) : 587
 Perform SMTP authentication: RFC 2554
 Use settings of mail retrieval
 Use POP before SMTP authentication
 
 POP:
 secure to dedicated port (TLS) : 995
 authentication : regular

1.48.e doesn't have an option under SMTP or POP either for SSL or TLS.  Going 
to have to move closer up to the present.
 
 Other than that, try installing stunnel.

Will probably try Stunnel before moving up.  If I can get the old version to 
work via Stunnel, then that will probably indicate that a new version, 
incorporating TLS, will work.r

--

Be well,
Jerry




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
Roelof,

Thank you.  The web-based email I'm using won't quote any of your message, so 
I'm pasting a bit.

1.48e is rather an oldie. You should upgrade to 1.62, that's running
under the same license that you've got now and it's still available
for download at the Ritlabs site: 
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php

I'll experiment with Stunnel first, then give 1.62 a try.

(*Something* has to work; can't take much more of this webmail.)


--

Be well,
Jerry


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
Thomas,

Thank you.

  DSL = Digital Subscriber Line.

Yes.

 jan I changed outgoing port settings from 25 to 465, incoming from
 jan 110 to 995, as instructed,
 
 This has to do with SSL, which is a secure protocol. It actually has
 nothing to do with whether you connect via dial-up or DSL. Change the
 ports back to 110 and 25.

ATT -- worldnet.att.net -- requires these port setting for DSL.  It also 
requires a secure connection through SSL. (I'm hoping, when I upgrade, that it 
will accept TLS
 
 SSL = Secure Socket Layer.

Yes.
 
 In the main menu, go to Options / Network Administration. Your setting
 shows Dial-Up, you need to switch it to LAN or manual connection.

Tried it.  Didn't work.  Thanks for the suggestion.


--

Be well,
Jerry


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
 You're probably correct on this as well as changing the 'connection'
 type to one of the 'TLS' options.
 
 1) Secure to dedicated port (TLS)
 
 2) Secure to regular port (STARTTLS)

Indeed, this might well work -- if 1.48e had a (TLS) or (STARTTLS) option.  It 
doesn''t though.  Ah, well.



--

Be well,
Jerry


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
 . . . If, in addition, his email provider also offers SSL, this has nothing 
 to do with whether he connects via dial-up or broadband.

Sadly, it does.  ATT insists upon it a secure connection for broadband, whereas 
they do not for dial-up.  It's an extra defense against spammers using their 
system, they say.

--

Be well,
Jerry


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb

 
 However, I think the OP was confused about DSL and SSL.
 
No, I wasn't.  I wish the answer were that simple.

--

Be well,
Jerry


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-05 Thread jmtb
 
  However, I think the OP was confused about DSL and SSL.
 
 Possibly. They haven't replied since the original post, so your guess
 is as good as mine.

Current circumstances prevent me from answering as frequently as I would like, 
or in a more timely fashion.


--

Be well,
Jerry


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-04 Thread jmtb
Hi,

I upgraded from my dial-up connection (worldnet.att.net) to DSL with the same 
ISP.  Everything works fine -- except for TB.  It won't connect.  I'm using TB 
version 148e, which has been doing just fine for me, sorting and handling all 
incoming and outgoing corresondece flawlessly, along with my 50K archived 
message.  Did until now, that is. 

I changed outgoing port settings from 25 to 465, incoming from 110 to 995, as 
instructed, fussed with all other of what seemed to be reasonable 
possibilities, with the best guesses of ATT tech support, which doesn't know 
TB.  That support seems baffled that there is no SSL setting in this version of 
TB (at least that I can find), which seems to be required in order for TB to 
work with ATT DSL.  (I tried checkiing the MD5APOP Challenge/Response 
(RFC-1734) option under Properties  Transport  Receive Mail  Authentication, 
but that didn't do anything.)

Anyone have a solution?

(Webmail is agonizing.)

Many thanks.

Jerry 


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html