Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Urban, On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:20:59 +0200 GMT (19/06/2006, 00:20 +0700 GMT), Urban wrote: U> The thing I like about shorterlinks is that they show where they are U> taking you before redirecting. Fair enough, but I get confused about all these services that offer shorter or tiny links. Wit

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Sunday 18 June 2006 at 6:20:59 PM, in , Urban wrote: > The thing I like about shorterlinks is that they show where they are > taking you before redirecting. Not for very long, but long enough to > copy the URL and stop the redirect by hitting a bookmark

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Wednesday, June 14, 2006, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > I don't think anyone will open a "shorterlink". Well, at least I > won't. Why don't you post both, the real link and - if you wish - the > shorter link? Ok. Here's the non-shortened one http://groups.google.com/group/opera.general/browse_frm/thr

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Urban, On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:57:20 +0200 GMT (10/06/2006, 04:57 +0700 GMT), Urban wrote: U> http://makeashorterlink.com/?I38622D3D I don't think anyone will open a "shorterlink". Well, at least I won't. Why don't you post both, the real link and - if you wish - the shorter link? -- Chee

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Monday, June 5, 2006, Ken wrote: > I've noticed this when running TB in conjunction with Opera 9 Beta. If > I shut down Opera TB behaves itself. I use straight POP3, no IMAP. I don't know if this is related, but there recently was a thread on Opera an RAM consumption on the opera.general newsgro

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

On Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 2:13:41, MFPA wrote: > Based on ...? There was an excellent article from Mark Russinovitch about this on , but unfortunately they now require you to subscribe to read it in full (previously, the complete ver

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi On Monday 5 June 2006 at 9:02:48 PM, in , Chris wrote: > I'd leave memory management to the doctors (Ph.D) at Microsoft. > They've got a bit more experience than the FreeRAM XP people. Based on ...? - -- Best regards, MFPA During an erup

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Chris, Monday, June 5, 2006, 10:02:48 PM, you wrote: C> No. I'd leave memory management to the doctors (Ph.D) at Microsoft. C> They've got a bit more experience than the FreeRAM XP people. Absolutely. They earned their degree by learning to pretend they know. :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:06:24 -0500, "Ken" said: > > Anyone else seeing that sort of memory leak/consumption? > > > I've noticed this when running TB in conjunction with Opera 9 Beta. > If I shut down Opera TB behaves itself. I use straight POP3, no IMAP. I'm not running Opera, but have to assum

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

>> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I >> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual >> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently >> using 512MB of VM! >> Anyone else seeing that sort of memory leak/consumption?

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Mark Partous @ 2006-6-05 5:36:52 AM "Virtual Memory overuse" > So, running something like FreeRAM XP Pro might be useful after all? No. I'd leave memory management to the doctors (Ph.D) at Microsoft. They've got a bit more experience than the FreeRAM XP people. -

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Ken & everyone else, on 05-Jun-2006 at 17:06 you (Ken) wrote: > I've noticed this when running TB in conjunction with Opera 9 Beta. > If I shut down Opera TB behaves itself. I use straight POP3, no IMAP. I'm using Opera9 beta as well and I don't see that behaviour. TB & Opera running for

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Curtis, On Sunday, June 4, 2006, 10:19:41 PM, you wrote: > I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I > returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual > memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently > using 512MB of VM!

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Jernej, Monday, June 5, 2006, 2:48:10 PM, you wrote: JS> On Monday, June 5, 2006, 11:36:52, Mark Partous wrote: >> So, running something like FreeRAM XP Pro might be useful after all? :-) JS> Never - these programs are a scam, plain and simple. Scam: fraudulent act, deception, swindle

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

On Monday, June 5, 2006, 11:36:52, Mark Partous wrote: > So, running something like FreeRAM XP Pro might be useful after all? :-) Never - these programs are a scam, plain and simple. The only thing they're capable of doing is pushing programs out of RAM to the swap file, which wouldn't help at a

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:39:57 +0200, "Roelof Otten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On a German list somebody wrote about TB using an increasing amount of > RAM while using IMAP accounts without an internet connection. I don't > know whether this is relevant, but I like to hear myself talking. ;-) I'm

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hello Roelof, Monday, June 5, 2006, 10:39:57 AM, you (and Curtis) wrote: C>> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I C>> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual C>> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently C>>

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

Hallo Curtis, On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:19:41 -0500GMT (5-6-2006, 5:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I C> returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual C> memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB!

Virtual Memory overuse

Hi, I was just running v3.80.06 and left it running for about a half day. I returned to see a windows systray popup about being out of virtual memory. I looked for the culprit and it was TB! which was currently using 512MB of VM! Anyone else seeing that sort of memory leak/consumption? -- -=