Re: Vs. 3 sorting problem

2004-09-07 Thread Michael Geyer
Hi Gunivortus and list, On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 at 20:49:40 GMT +0200 (which was 20:49 where I live) Gunivortus Goos wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Vs. 3 sorting problem": > A friend, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is member of a mai

Re: Vs. 3 sorting problem

2004-09-07 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gunivortus Goos, 07-Sep-2004 20:49, you wrote: > Could that please be corrected? > F.i. a filterstring should just sorted once. Another note... maybe I got you wrong first... do you mean that the "priority" of the new filtering system (from top to bottom) is broken in v3? ie. is your "priv

Re: Vs. 3 sorting problem

2004-09-07 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Gunivortus Goos, 07-Sep-2004 20:49, you wrote: > Could that please be corrected? That doesn't need to be corrected - the filter works as expected: any message from your friend goes to the folder where you keep the conversations with him. You have to adapt your filter to a more precise mat

Vs. 3 sorting problem

2004-09-07 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi, the new filter-sorting system makes troubles here. Example: A friend, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is member of a mailinglist. His contributions to that list are sorted in the correct listfolder. But we're writing also a lot in private, so I've a folder especially for his mails. He's writing me with