Re: Voyager: pryvacy broken in log files?
MFPA: Hi On Tuesday 18 February 2014 at 4:39:51 PM, in mid:5p27g9tj3a95bpsklmrqapmjbmofhqs...@4ax.com, Luca wrote: IMAP_1.log SMTP.log These ones contain email text, not encrypted, and I don't know how to avoid that. In TB! you go to the properties of an account, then on the tree on the left, under Transport, is an entry called Protocol Logging. On that pane are two tick-boxes and the paths to two files. Protocol Logging is only needed to investigate problems with sending or receiving mail. That's it, thank you. -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Voyager: pryvacy broken in log files?
Hello, I found two files in the folders of one of may IMAP accounts in Voyager: IMAP_1.log SMTP.log These ones contain email text, not encrypted, and I don't know how to avoid that. My questions: - Is there any way to encrypt these log files too? - Or how do I prevent their creation? - Are there any other files in Voyager where data encryption is not effective? Thanks -- Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Voyager: pryvacy broken in log files?
Hi On Tuesday 18 February 2014 at 4:39:51 PM, in mid:5p27g9tj3a95bpsklmrqapmjbmofhqs...@4ax.com, Luca wrote: Hello, I found two files in the folders of one of may IMAP accounts in Voyager: IMAP_1.log SMTP.log These ones contain email text, not encrypted, and I don't know how to avoid that. My questions: - Is there any way to encrypt these log files too? - Or how do I prevent their creation? - Are there any other files in Voyager where data encryption is not effective? I don't have Voyager, but my guess is they could be Protocol Logging files like you can set The Bat! to create. In TB! you go to the properties of an account, then on the tree on the left, under Transport, is an entry called Protocol Logging. On that pane are two tick-boxes and the paths to two files. Protocol Logging is only needed to investigate problems with sending or receiving mail. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Only dead fish go with the flow Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hi On Wednesday 20 March 2013 at 1:10:37 PM, in mid:1279785482.20130320141...@partous.com, Mark Partous wrote: This is what is in the configuration: Create an update to an existing archive H:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk The BU ran today but stopped saying it couldn't find I:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk H is an external USB drive. I does not exist (sometimes there's a USB-stick or another device that gets that Drive-Letter, but none was connected today. Just a thought. What happens if you address your external USB drive by means of a mount point instead of its own drive letter? -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com It's better to feed one cat than many mice Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hello Roelof, Sunday, March 17, 2013, 11:24:46 AM, you wrote: RO However, for the next time something like this occurs, you could set RO the account log a bit larger. TB's default log size is 20 kB, but it RO can easily handle log file of 1000 kB. (Mine is set to 4000 kB) I did not find where to change the size, yet. Does a larger log size cause a slowdown? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 5.3.8.5 (BETA) 78 days remaining in 2012. Actually it's 79 days) + less than 24 hours. Yours truly residing on earth for 20217 days now. Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hallo Mark, On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:57:20 +0100GMT (20-3-2013, 9:57 , where I live), you wrote: RO However, for the next time something like this occurs, you could set RO the account log a bit larger. TB's default log size is 20 kB, but it RO can easily handle log file of 1000 kB. (Mine is set to 4000 kB) MP I did not find where to change the size, yet. Account - Properties - Options - Maximum account log size MP Does a larger log size cause a slowdown? Not that I'm aware of, but I changed the maximum log size about ten years ago, so I can't compare. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof Moderator-n-- see also god, dictator, egotist, oppressor. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.3.8.5 (BETA) Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 5 pop3 accounts, 2 imap accounts OTFE disabled i7-2600 3.4GHz 4 GB RAM Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hello Roelof, Sunday, March 17, 2013, 11:24:46 AM, you wrote: RO TB does need a fixed path to the backup location, can't be helped. I find all of this rather confusing: This is what is in the configuration: Create an update to an existing archive H:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk The BU ran today but stopped saying it couldn't find I:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk H is an external USB drive. I does not exist (sometimes there's a USB-stick or another device that gets that Drive-Letter, but none was connected today. While the BU's are planned on a weekly basis and it ran today, that should suggest the latest BU would have dated from Wed, March 13. To make all this even more confusing I found a Back-Up made yesterday in: F:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk F is a internal HD. Beats me! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 5.3.8.5 (BETA) 78 days remaining in 2012. Actually it's 79 days) + less than 24 hours. Yours truly residing on earth for 20217 days now. Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hello Roelof, Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 11:27:37 AM, you wrote: MP I did not find where to change the size, yet. RO Account - Properties - Options - Maximum account log size Thanks! I was looking for a global settings, that's probably why I couldn't find it. MP Does a larger log size cause a slowdown? RO Not that I'm aware of, but I changed the maximum log size about ten RO years ago, so I can't compare. ;-) :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 5.3.8.5 (BETA) Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hi Mark, I find all of this rather confusing: This is what is in the configuration: Create an update to an existing archive H:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk The BU ran today but stopped saying it couldn't find I:\TB-BU\TBBU.tbk H is an external USB drive. I does not exist ( Sounds familiar. TB sometimes sees my external USB flash-drive, sometimes it says that it can't find it. No matter if I use USB 2.0 or 3.0 and using a direct connection or through my USB-hub. I've experienced too similar problems when using my NAS over LAN for this. Strange enough.. doing manually a BU it works all the time. :-) -- Regards, Gunivortus Using The Bat Vs. 5.3.8.4 (BETA) under Windows 8 Pro 64 bit POP3 only. Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hallo Mark, On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 01:11:05 +0100GMT (17-3-2013, 1:11 , where I live), you wrote: MP Are the log files being archived somewhere or is what we MP get to see when we click the View MP Accountlog-button, all that is left? Find your mail directory, every account has its own log file in its own account directory. What I get to see with view log is not the latest entry in the loig file, but that might be a beta issue. -- Groetjes, Roelof I am MODERATOR of Borg:off topic msgs are futile,you will be moderated http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.3.8.4 (BETA) Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 5 pop3 accounts, 2 imap accounts OTFE disabled i7-2600 3.4GHz 4 GB RAM Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hello Roelof, Sunday, March 17, 2013, 8:23:19 AM, you wrote: RO Find your mail directory, every account has its own log file in its RO own account directory. What I get to see with view log is not the RO latest entry in the loig file, but that might be a beta issue. Thanks, but that log also merely goes back to 16/03/2013 while I wanted to be able to proof (in case it was necessary) a message was sent on the 13th. I also have Back-Ups made with Second Copy, but those only have a log reaching 'till March, 15th. The Back-Up made with TB! itself dates from the 5th (It sometimes does not make a copy saying it doesn't find the HD on which the copy has to be made - the HD is there but it has another Drive Letter than TB! searches for - TB seems to be the only program that sees a change of drive letter). -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 5.3.6.2 (BETA) 75 days remaining in 2012. Actually it's 76 days) + less than 24 hours. Yours truly residing on earth for 20214 days now. Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log Files
Hallo Mark, On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:14:28 +0100GMT (17-3-2013, 10:14 , where I live), you wrote: MP Thanks, but that log also merely goes back to 16/03/2013 while I MP wanted to be able to proof (in case MP it was necessary) a message was sent on the 13th. In that case you're out of luck. However, for the next time something like this occurs, you could set the account log a bit larger. TB's default log size is 20 kB, but it can easily handle log file of 1000 kB. (Mine is set to 4000 kB) MP The Back-Up made with TB! itself dates from the 5th (It MP sometimes does not make a copy saying it MP doesn't find the HD on which the copy has to be made - the MP HD is there but it has another Drive MP Letter than TB! searches for - TB seems to be the only program MP that sees a change of drive letter). TB does need a fixed path to the backup location, can't be helped. -- Groetjes, Roelof Moderator's Murphy's Law: Take a vacation and s**t hits the fan. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 5.3.8.4 (BETA) Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 5 pop3 accounts, 2 imap accounts OTFE disabled i7-2600 3.4GHz 4 GB RAM Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Log Files
Hello, Are the log files being archived somewhere or is what we get to see when we click the View Accountlog-button, all that is left? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 5.3.6.2 (BETA) Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Log Files and Error Reporting
Hello Everyone, I noticed that one of my accounts did not receive any emails and assumed it was due to the holiday season. Only today I realised that I had changed the password when travelling. While searching for the error it occurred to me that I never received any error message (obvious and visible) that the server had rejected connection. I had checked logs but did not realise at the time that they are all account specific, so when I clicked on logs before being in another account, it showed retrieved messages. Is there any other way to be alerted to retrieval problems or to access an overall log for all accounts? This would make it so much easier to check when you have more than a few accounts. -- Best regards, Tom using TheBat! 4.0.28.3 on XP Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
log files
I am setting up again my backup system and found 2 large log files in theBat as part of the protocol logging: pop.log and smtp.log (800MB and 500MB). Do I need these files, should I back them up, or can I get rid of them by deactivating? Is there a way to keep them for only a few days? -- Best regards, Peter The BAT 3.99.8, Windows XP Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: log files
Peter Kerekes @ 2007-6-16 3:16:39 PM log files mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do I need [pop.log and smtp.log] files, Only if something is going wrong when you send or check for messages. should I back them up, No. or can I get rid of them by deactivating? Yes. Open the account in question's properties. Go to Protocol Logging, under Transport. Uncheck both boxes. Is there a way to keep them for only a few days? You could schedule a Windows task to delete them periodically. -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. When in doubt, use brute force. -Ken Thompson pgpBEqgEVWGNQ.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: log files
Hello Chris, Saturday, June 16, 2007, 5:06:30 PM, you wrote: Chris Peter Kerekes @ 2007-6-16 3:16:39 PM Chris log files mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do I need [pop.log and smtp.log] files, Chris Only if something is going wrong when you send or check for messages. should I back them up, Chris No. or can I get rid of them by deactivating? Chris Yes. Open the account in question's properties. Go to Protocol Chris Logging, under Transport. Uncheck both boxes. Is there a way to keep them for only a few days? Chris You could schedule a Windows task to delete them periodically. Thank you. I think I will deactivate them until I run into a problem. -- Best regards, Peter The BAT 3.99.8, Windows XP, Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log files
Hi On Monday 23 October 2006 at 1:14:41 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns wrote: No. Just turn off pop logging in account properties -- transport. As Roelof said, it is meant for debugging and should only be enabled when there's a problem with receiving mails. Out of curiosity, was this previously on by default? I notice it is enabled on some (mainly older) accounts but disabled on others, including newly-created. -- Best regards, MFPA Beware the deadly donkey falling slowly from the sky Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log files
Hallo MFPA, On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:41:02 +0100GMT (28-10-2006, 2:41 , where I live), you wrote: No. Just turn off pop logging in account properties -- transport. As Roelof said, it is meant for debugging and should only be enabled when there's a problem with receiving mails. M Out of curiosity, was this previously on by default? I notice it M is enabled on some (mainly older) accounts but disabled on others, M including newly-created. I think it's off by default. I distinctly remember having to enable it for myself, back when it was introduced. -- Groetjes, Roelof WYSIWYG: see Optical illusion http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpCSPo7ZqpTn.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Log files
Saturday, October 28, 2006, 5:41:02 AM, you wrote: M Out of curiosity, was this previously on by default? I notice it is M enabled on some (mainly older) accounts but disabled on others, M including newly-created. It was enabled on my older accounts but not the newer ones. To be honest, I don't remember whether I enabled it myself or it was on by default. I think it may have been the latter, but I can't be sure. -- Rick Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log files
Hallo Richard, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:47:56 +0500GMT (23-10-2006, 6:47 , where I live), you wrote: RHS Awhile ago I noticed that the log file for my main account has been RHS getting rather large - 300MB at the moment. I don't need to log every RHS single action indefinitely, so I went to account properties|options RHS and checked verbose log, and then set the maximum size to 1MB. RHS However, even after closing/restarting TB! the log file remains the RHS same size. What am I missing? I don't know. Over here TB keeps the log trimmed down to 10 MB, as I instructed. I don't have 'verbose log' checked, because TB gives less information about the triggered filters when you've got that enabled (sounds silly, but it's true). But in the days I had that enabled TB kept the size down as well. Just for testing purposes I set my log size back to five MB and closed TB. Size didn't change. Started TB again and the log was abbreviated, so I guess it works. You realize of course that the log size is indicated in kilobytes, not bytes, so for a log size of 1 MB you need to enter 1000. I know I've got this talent to state the obvious, but I just wanted to be sure. -- Groetjes, Roelof Pride is what we have. Vanity is what others have. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpHMXKcDzvbP.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Log files
Roelof, Monday, October 23, 2006, 2:29:42 PM, you wrote: RO Over here TB keeps the log trimmed down to 10 MB, as I instructed. RO I don't have 'verbose log' checked, because TB gives less RO information about the triggered filters when you've got that RO enabled (sounds silly, but it's true). I unchecked verbose log but left it at 1MB (1000KB) and closed/restarted TB!, but there was no change in the log size. Seems that here controlling the size isn't possible. Is there a downside to simply not logging at all? I always have the log at the bottom of the account during active sessions, and frankly that's all I've ever checked anyway. -- Rick Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log files
Hallo Richard, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:38:12 +0500GMT (23-10-2006, 12:38 , where I live), you wrote: RHS I unchecked verbose log but left it at 1MB (1000KB) and RHS closed/restarted TB!, but there was no change in the log size. Seems RHS that here controlling the size isn't possible. Just to be sure. We're talking about the account.log file here and not about the pop.log and the smtp.log files, are we? The latter too can't be set to a specific size, as they're merely intended for debugging purposes. The account.log can't be disabled. You could try deleting it with TB closed and see whether it stays within the limits. -- Groetjes, Roelof FIDO: the Information Frontage Road. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpD8bmzJQoP4.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Log files
Roelof, Monday, October 23, 2006, 4:05:50 PM, you wrote: RO Just to be sure. We're talking about the account.log file here and not RO about the pop.log and the smtp.log files, are we? The latter too can't RO be set to a specific size, as they're merely intended for debugging RO purposes. I was talking about the pop.log. As I said, it's reached 300MB and growing weekly. Is there a way to trim it? -- Thanks, Rick Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log files
Hi Richard, on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:39:40 +0500GMT (23.10.2006, 13:39 +0200GMT here), you wrote: RO Just to be sure. We're talking about the account.log file here and not RO about the pop.log and the smtp.log files, are we? The latter too can't RO be set to a specific size, as they're merely intended for debugging RO purposes. RHS I was talking about the pop.log. As I said, it's reached 300MB and RHS growing weekly. Is there a way to trim it? No. Just turn off pop logging in account properties -- transport. As Roelof said, it is meant for debugging and should only be enabled when there's a problem with receiving mails. -- Cheers Peter Love your enemies: they'll go crazy trying to figure out what you're up to. Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Log files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Peter, Monday, October 23, 2006, 5:14:41 PM, you wrote: PM No. Just turn off pop logging in account properties -- transport. PM As Roelof said, it is meant for debugging and should only be PM enabled when there's a problem with receiving mails. I turned off pop logging. Out of curiosity I opened the file in notepad, and was shocked to see that it included the text, etc., of all of my messages. Needless to say, I immediately deleted the log files for all of my accounts. - -- Rick -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.52 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJFPMKJAAoJELf6ImSjvaeW3mMP/04LSfkzzJANx8pi6FQQ/aXl gtnwEvMtEvJP6gc3FstU8lzOTOVyWIcPW2hxqYY38oEnX5k9djHhU/9gYaIpukIk 6kmiBbKpaPJX2WwqM03YEEnCQ5b88vgak5rGUiJAmH5vAW+h/3NyjbEERGHi5cJz KcqWaZK8FlTTV/XJ7msbUZh3bvsOCP5P4L6zwfbXc1dg2wSyvq/oEPhwZH260hLQ KYq/17Q2FoqzR+DfmhdDq4M1JDd5MZzkw3SnaBXNm1cPrD9fAGJq1KzGEFNeXisP Ql+jCMzyq4IlcDs8UrdfxFiSshYUptAmgIsMukdQw8nrcitQstzOuopo0IZh8J2O IuNToQT05fWX1HpulbzAQf6sW1qK4DPEWv31r4P9TRgfJzqf/IVrTFkuXilGKSvJ sWlaa28HAL+YSAB6Nprf9ivM8AcJzqYYZ0vjTMNeHCc4OrrNkJlzPGM1KKvN9+ma ySgEPw/Fjq7BIDA7goNza5yyfzXGa0nD9wqKIk0hMefj3dM9DcuxcVMfdAAhSCCW fCBP7N5i6jxnC5EFpiN/uigKKx8cLuME1ZRIPPOHewYcVJ06Zy8nkF0jM8plIOpK BMNeDgtjtYf+pI1rLQmZrq77Bm8P1SmdKYruChfWVXl2Rlpq2+31Vv/e71An3XIg Pn28hdaFxOPzf42XsIzr =yptm -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Log files and encrypted mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 23 Oct 2006, @ @ at 18:24:29 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote: I turned off pop logging. Out of curiosity I opened the file in notepad, and was shocked to see that it included the text, etc., of all of my messages. Needless to say, I immediately deleted the log files for all of my accounts. This is what exists as a standard behavior of this sort of logging, and is nothing...illegal, or an omission in the design. In the quite same fashion, _all_ your messages, that are not encrypted, are entirely and very easily readable to practically, and literally, entire Inter Net / world, in the process of the transport and otherwise. This is the reason why encrypted mail is used, for instance, thus being some sort of envelope, so nobody else can read it save the recipient(s). Besides, fragments, or entire letters, also can be found as the parts of OS's swap file (in XP the Pagefile.sys) and can be read very easily, as an ordinary plain text, just by opening it in some a bit more advanced text editor, when the OS is not active (from an other OS, for instance, installed on another partition, disk, bootable diskette, CD...). Therefore, all the mail by default is treated as written on post cards, being thus open and readable to everyone. The mail you don't want to be exposed this way, you should (keep) encrypt(ed). - -- Mica ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From field, otherwise it will not reach me. ~~~ GPG keys/docs/software at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ http://tronogi.tripod.com/pgp/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 670 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, Gentoo Vector ~ Wine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-svn-4298 o tiger192 (Cygwin/MinGW32) iQEVAwUBRTzdl7SpHvHEUtv8AQhNVAf/SpE0cFyT7PSj/GpwqoildQDl2HIzAxVY o5K5SfOkavoqrfk76fsWypjSyaAv5O739mL1BUKRpW4jy9RnGSgOBQcaOg+SwQ1X 6Gs5iuFU6VMA7jTy5mDNC4m5eafuaecuylqhmkj/3CgaJcYHCKBPv/2eCHMJlrT8 1oRbh2bK0f9q+YY0mRAdhNBoaQm9k5kqlLujYQKIN4Kq74mjwuyXcPO+SJ1wErpx e/2vNs8YWnr4unNP6NaWuDFuvBe5+KNspdadMKVDEkVOe9u8WYyxeGVO7VMF5pHu A+r43n2uSXAzL3QxtNS7Zf6QqFrG102xOkZajXNKtx6/kIyNLbJjUg== =gb3U -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Log files and encrypted mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mica, Monday, October 23, 2006, 8:19:52 PM, you wrote: MM This is what exists as a standard behavior of this sort of MM logging, and is nothing...illegal, or an omission in the MM design. I understand it's not illegal or a flaw; I guess I was just surprised that much detail was preserved in them. Not their fault, just my ignorance. MM In the quite same fashion, _all_ your messages, that are not MM encrypted, are entirely and very easily readable to practically, MM and literally, entire Inter Net / world, in the process of the MM transport and otherwise. That I clearly know. MM The mail you don't want to be exposed this way, you should (keep) MM encrypt(ed). Unfortunately, none of my family or friends use pgp/gpg. They've long since ceased asking about the headers and footers on signed messages. If the process becomes easier, maybe then they will, but they don't see the point of paying for PGP and so GnuPG is more than they are willing to deal with. In the meantime, I will at least not keep log files lying around in the open like that. - -- Rick -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.52 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJFPWGpAAoJELf6ImSjvaeWeD8QAL3iCvXzIm2q51ZdXXv56t/J kgaW5mOG9duDdfnwMlF873891xgmGuZPgOo1mgL2wIsZ6O8QxrSCcR2FjzoF5+Lr LHOtXlinGC+woJTWoQrv/mBXCx/TS53RDcvNZId8foLG7UjXBjpiBvNvi4PsmYME q+RmeqljG9JsV9mSPXgVnT0OonU37dTXDz15HPQsybJB9IUXOzx/e+eN3aQb6xf0 lYkXzxcG0fMzueUMV7E2pWD2aAtR8nbQiNhK0AgFNBulbte/QRmIET7qrE2Y8P6c WigLoT96T+YyChfsxxN8c8ddq3anBCljo/yRec69jwMfejgZCUCF4TDsV0ryV45K 9/UhTK23YHhkXgeUyakiwZNU8u0qj0qH+gNwb4uEjaP1VE329BrGkiClGy8MbQJI 0I7UFLWPqfkPtomzMvJwV7w1NxYtcLnY7yF0jtp27XrM3dqbp7p0JUWEDuWjntVi uUIc73PjL319A9zoCj0ZtxgAXCwbKbiqcfn3AsPE+zzMXt6kIy6vFOxD3RUyt5ao PLlcr8nx5MCimOFA3o0weiKIgKU04r8nk85UgqBpzukTFirsKp4HOr3SJ7HiAHo1 9+WbcpxZPF+6y9OxLzpfZPAdfBLLFMr1i/6IIUi0Kb+m9mCr9LBrdfH/BGX51HZl Z9CWS6Q0D4ogxe5r73fr =B5Vv -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Log files
Awhile ago I noticed that the log file for my main account has been getting rather large - 300MB at the moment. I don't need to log every single action indefinitely, so I went to account properties|options and checked verbose log, and then set the maximum size to 1MB. However, even after closing/restarting TB! the log file remains the same size. What am I missing? -- Thanks, Rick Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Searching Log Files
Is there any way of searching within the log file in TB? I know I could copy and paste the file to a word processor, but I'd rather search the log file itself. I tried F7, but that doesn't work, nor does the Windows search which is normally invoked by CTRL-F. I using TB 2.01.3 Business edition on a PC running XP Professional. Thanks for any help. -- Mike Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Searching Log Files
On Sunday, January 25, 2004, Roelof Otten wrote: You can access the log file from disk in: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\Accountname\Account.log Accountname needs to be substituted with the name of the account. On my system I've associated .log files with Notepad, so double clicking does the trick for me. I tried that and it worked easily. Thanks for the advice. -- Mike Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Searching Log Files
Is there any way of searching within the log file in TB? I know I could copy and paste the file to a word processor, but I'd rather search the log file itself. I tried F7, but that doesn't work. Thanks for any help. -- Mike Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
