Hi Marck,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:05:10 PM, Marck wrote:
MDP Hi Neal,
MDP @19-Oct-2003, 19:28 -0800 (20-Oct 04:28 UK time) Neal Laugman said
MDP to Jack:
JM 1. Give us an easier/less time consuming/less dangerous(for
JM klutzes like me) way of doing it.
JM 2. Change it on *their* end.
Hi John
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 6:06:03 PM, you wrote:
JM For example only 5 people (who's keys I have) can read what I encrypted below:
JM - -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
This is encrypted text, right? So these 5 people are ALL sharing the same
public/private key combination?
Cheers,
--
On 10/19/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vishal said:
JM - -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
This is encrypted text, right? So these 5 people are ALL sharing the same
public/private key combination?
Actually, you use someone's PUBLIC key to encrypt the message, and
then ONLY the PRIVATE key can
Hello Marck,
I try to follow the thread about PGP and all, and I understand that your message has a
tick because you sign it different from the others, right? Does that mean that one can
only verify your message in TB and the likes, and not in Outlook? Or it doesn't
matter?
--
regards,
Hello John,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:51:06 -0500 GMT (20/10/2003, 09:51 +0700 GMT),
John Morse wrote:
I have made a patch that will change the X-Mailer Header for you.
It will change your x-mailer header from:
The Bat! (v2.01) Personal
to
Ritlabs! (v2.01) Personal
Thanks; now let's see
Hello ETM,
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:16:56 -0400 GMT (20/10/2003, 05:16 +0700 GMT),
ETM wrote:
I thought the latest version of TB! had an option to disable the
X-mailer identification in the headers but I can't find it.
This option is still not there. :-(
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der
Hi Jim
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:37:34 AM, you wrote:
JD On 10/19/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD Vishal said:
JM - -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
This is encrypted text, right? So these 5 people are ALL sharing the same
public/private key combination?
JD Actually, you use someone's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
J I couldn't get your key, it said unknown key
20 October 2003 09:17:53: I don't know what I am doing wrong but I
have this morning uploaded keys to Public Key:
idap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370. Please try again
- --
Regards
Nigel
Hi Jurgen
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:55:56 AM, you wrote:
JH I try to follow the thread about PGP and all, and I understand that
JH your message has a tick because you sign it different from the others,
JH right?
Actually, the very fact that it is signed causes it to be ticked. People here
are
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:05:10 +0100 GMT (20/10/2003, 11:05 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Precisely!!! This practice should be campaigned against, not
encouraged by hiding from it and thus permitting it by default.
For some reason I cannot find an X-Mailer header in your
Hello Vishal,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 10:35:44 AM, you wrote:
JH Does that mean that one can only verify your message in TB and the
JH likes, and not in Outlook? Or it doesn't matter?
You should be able to verify the message in any client, provided there are no
compatibility problems
Hello Marck,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 6:05:10 AM, you wrote:
MDP Yes. By people rejecting ISPs who illegally block sending software.
MDP Make your friends aware of this. Report the ISPs concerned to RIT -
MDP they'll deal with them. This calls for education, not kow-towing to
MDP ignorance.
Hello Plusnet,
On 20 October 2003, at 01:05:45 (GMT +0100) you wrote:
P What is the best version of PGP to download and install.
The all version of PGP are best ;) But better to use the latest version.
As I know at present day the latest version is 8.0.2. I use this version
and I'm satisfied.
Hello Jurgen,
On 20 October 2003, at 08:55:56 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
JH Does that mean that one can only verify your message in TB and the
JH likes, and not in Outlook?
Outlook don't do it because it don't support PGP/MIME.
Only users of TB can encrypt/decrypt/sign in/from PGP/MIME format.
Hello Melissa,
On 19 October 2003, at 17:30:58 (GMT -0700) you wrote:
MR Actually, the latest free version is 8.0.2. You can get it at the PGP
MR Corporation site:
A few days ago somewhere (don't remember where) I saw some letter signed
by PGP which have string like following:
-BEGIN PGP
Hello Jurgen,
On 20 October 2003, at 10:55:59 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
JH last message all right (as I now can see), but I asked me for the
JH password I used to make the key. I will see (when I send this
JH message here) if it will do that all the time. That would be a pain.
JH ARGH,
Hi Nigel,
@20-Oct-2003, 09:25 Nigel Shortell [NS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to John:
J I couldn't get your key, it said unknown key
NS 20 October 2003 09:17:53: I don't know what I am doing wrong
NS but I have this morning uploaded keys to Public Key:
NS idap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings Vasiliy,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 5:54:18 AM, you wrote:
Vasiliy A few days ago somewhere (don't remember where) I saw some letter signed
Vasiliy by PGP which have string like following:
Vasiliy -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vasiliy
Hi Thomas,
@20-Oct-2003, 15:27 +0700 (09:27 UK time) Thomas Fernandez said to
Marck:
Precisely!!! This practice should be campaigned against, not
encouraged by hiding from it and thus permitting it by default.
For some reason I cannot find an X-Mailer header in your own
message...
Hello Marck,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 5:30:57 PM, you wrote:
BH Is TB2 really this flaky?
MDP No. 1.62 was and it left your folders in that state. Now you've
MDP fixed them they'll stay straight.
Thanks, I must say that since repairing the folders, etc.
everything now seems OK.
Hello DG,
On 20 October 2003, at 07:27:54 (GMT -0400) you wrote:
DRS 'Twas myself sir and actually it is PGP 6.5.8ckt build...
DRS ...what you want displayed for the PGP version within your PGP sig.
I understand. I was deceived :)
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings Vasiliy,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 7:53:26 AM, you wrote:
DRS 'Twas myself sir and actually it is PGP 6.5.8ckt build...
DRS ...what you want displayed for the PGP version within your PGP sig.
Vasiliy I understand. I was deceived :)
Hello DG,
On 20 October 2003, at 08:13:50 (GMT -0400) you wrote:
DRS Not my intent Vasiliy.
Oh, no, I don't resent and don't blame you! Just I thought that already
exists PGP 9 :)
--
Best regards,
Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 3:51:06 AM, John Morse wrote:
I will update this patch with each new version
I can also make you a personalized patch, but you
must send me your message and it has to be 25 characters
in length (including spaces)
This is good work for the people on the list,
Hello,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 12:28:15 PM, you wrote:
MDP Hi Thomas,
MDP @20-Oct-2003, 15:27 +0700 (09:27 UK time) Thomas Fernandez said to
MDP Marck:
Precisely!!! This practice should be campaigned against, not
encouraged by hiding from it and thus permitting it by default.
For some
10/19/2003, 9:53 PM: Jack said in TheBat! on a blacklist?
JM Maybe the nice folks at Ritlabs! will:
JM 2. Change it on *their* end.
Last night in TBBETA Stefan said:
There will be a new 2.01 build tonight or tomorrow with more fixes for
icons (radio buttons instead of check boxes) and a new
Hello Vasiliy,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 12:54:52 PM, you wrote:
On 20 October 2003, at 10:55:59 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
JH last message all right (as I now can see), but I asked me for the
JH password I used to make the key. I will see (when I send this
JH message here) if it will
Hello Allen,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 10:08:54 AM, you wrote
re: TheBat! on a blacklist?:
A There will be a new 2.01 build tonight
I thought 2.01 was already out.
--
Peace!
Wayne Howard
Another world is indeed possible!
www.natcap.org
Hello Plusnet,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 6:10:11 PM, you wrote:
GW
GW Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
GW http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
P Hi Gordon, thanks for finding that line i thought i was going mad.
P
Odd little problem with my glyphs. When I upgraded to 2.0 the glyphs
didn't change, even though the splash logo did. I moved up to 2.01,
but still no change. I didn't think much of it until there was a
discussion here of alternate glyph collections and I thought I might
try something different.
10/20/2003, 10:26 AM: Wayne said in TheBat! on a blacklist?
WH Hello Allen,
WH On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 10:08:54 AM, you wrote
WH re: TheBat! on a blacklist?:
A There will be a new 2.01 build tonight
WH I thought 2.01 was already out.
I guess there will be a new-er 2.01 build --
Hello Vishal,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:29:01 AM, you wrote:
V That's exactly what I meant. If all 5 people have the same public
V key, they would all also need a copy of the private key to decrypt
V it.
No, if you encrypt a message using my public key, and Marck's public
key, and Allie's
Hello Richard,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 12:58:59 PM, you wrote:
snip
RW I still, personally, fail to see the benefits a humble citizen
RW with nothing to hide (well not yet anyway) can benefit from having
RW yet another gizzmo to add to things but I am willing to be
RW persuaded (slowly!).
Hello rich,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:27:17 PM, you wrote:
rg Where do I find server | send to? The only PGP options (all
rg under Tools) I see are:
rg Choose version
rg Key manager
rg Preferences
Do it from within the Key Manager.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end
Hello rich,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 8:27:17 PM, you wrote:
rg
rg Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
rg http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
moderator
This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
Hello Gene,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 4:42:12 PM, you wrote:
GB We have two computers networked here at home, and each has TB
GB installed. The same upgrade files were used on both computers--one
GB changed, the other didn't. How can this be?
Could it be that in the one that didn't change,
Hello Allen,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 10:46:15 AM, you wrote
re: TheBat! on a blacklist?:
A 10/20/2003, 10:26 AM: Wayne said in TheBat! on a blacklist?
WH Hello Allen,
WH On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 10:08:54 AM, you wrote
WH re: TheBat! on a blacklist?:
A There will be a new 2.01
Hi,
Let me preface my problem by stating that I am totally blind, so may
not be accurately depicting what visually was happening on my screen.
THis morning, I started TB as normal, but to my surprise, my folder
list was cut off -- that is, I only was able to read the first
character of each
Hello Wayne,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:05:47 AM, you wrote:
WH I'm not sure what you mean. I know what you mean by adding a
WH space, but knows to trim - what do you mean by that? Knows to trim
WH what?
In your template, you need the -- . It appears you have the --,
but are missing the
Sunday, October 19, 2003, Edgar wrote:
When I use the sign complete message it goes trough the clipboards and
OE can check it.
Can I automate this signing of the message?
Go to the archives and look for this message:
Subject: Re: PGP/Mime and extra line feed on TBOT
From: Martin Webster
Monday, October 20, 2003, John Morse wrote:
You need to Hack the X-Mailer line in your copy of the_Bat!
Before you do that, please note that it could be considered reverse
engineering and in conflict with the license agreement.
There was a thread on this on the list back in April, starting
Hello Leif,
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 11:56:31 AM, you wrote
re: TheBat! on a blacklist?:
LG In your template, you need the -- . It appears you have the --,
LG but are missing the trailing space after it. So, when someone replies
LG to your message, the below is left.
Thanks for letting
Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:08:54 AM, you wrote:
10/19/2003, 9:53 PM: Jack said in TheBat! on a blacklist?
JM Maybe the nice folks at Ritlabs! will:
JM 2. Change it on *their* end.
Last night in TBBETA Stefan said:
There will be a new 2.01 build tonight or tomorrow with more fixes for
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Try shift-ctrl-alt-L.
What is this? No context, no further instructions, just a key sequence?
Exactly how is this supposed to help?
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
rg Where do I find server | send to? The only PGP options (all
rg under Tools) I see are:
rgChoose version
rgKey manager
rgPreferences
LG Do it from within the Key Manager.
On my copy of TB! (2.00.6) Server | Send to is NOT available under the key manager,
or any other option, in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try shift-ctrl-alt-L.
Thanks Thomas. I tired it, but got a message that read 0 lost folders found.
*Where* did you try this? On what screen/at what point/etc.?
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Backup (rename) the account.* files. Then create the accounts in TB
and close TB. Now overwrite the newly created account.* files with the
backups and reopen TB. Your Account / Properties setting should be
fine from the backups.
*Now* hit shft-crtl-alt-L.
Ahhh..
Hello Wayne,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 10:28:27 AM, you wrote:
WH Thanks for letting me know and taking the time to explain it to
WH me! So the -- really does serve a purpose!
Yeppers it does.
You've got it right, it trimmed off all your sig stuff. Thanks.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and
Hi Pixie,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:25:09 -0400GMT (20.10.03, 18:25 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
P Public keys are a nice source of valid email addresses. I expect there
P is public key harvesting going on..
I don't believe so, as only few of my addresses on my key get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 5:24:22 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
NA Yes, I've tried that but the 'Bold' and 'Italics' buttons are not
NA available.
MDP You seem to be overlooking the item drop down combo. You have to
MDP format the plain text
Hi Leif,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:59:48 -0600GMT (20.10.03, 16:59 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
...
LG Sending unencrypted e-mail is like sending a postcard, where the
LG mailperson could be reading it as he/she walks down the street and
LG giggling over the wish you were
Hi Leif
Monday, October 20, 2003, 10:53:05 AM, you wrote:
LG Hello Vishal,
LG Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:29:01 AM, you wrote:
V That's exactly what I meant. If all 5 people have the same public
V key, they would all also need a copy of the private key to decrypt
V it.
LG No
*Yes*. All 5
Hello Jurgen,
On 20 October 2003, at 16:24:47 (GMT +0200) you wrote:
JH you mean I have to do that outside of TB, in the settings for the PG?
Yes, I meant external PGP.
JH I am using GnuPG and can't find anything in the settings via GPGshell...
Oops. I was mistaken. Sorry, I can't
Hi ken,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:43:04 -0500GMT (20.10.03, 18:43 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Try shift-ctrl-alt-L.
Thanks Thomas. I tired it, but got a message that read 0 lost folders found.
kg *Where* did you try this? On what screen/at what point/etc.?
You'll have
Hello John,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 4:31:47 AM GMT, you wrote:
J I couldn't get your key, it said unknown key
20 October 2003 18:28:44: Thanks for your help, here is my key:
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: PGP 8.0.2
Comment: Public Key: idap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370
Hi David,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:57:29 +0100GMT (20.10.03, 13:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DS sometimes using xray can add to the problems.
Yes, indeed. I cannot send PGP/MIME signed or encrypted messages with
this list account via xray. On other accounts it works
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:03:22 AM, Mark wrote:
MP Could it be that in the one that didn't change, you did not check High
MP colour images on the Options/Preferences/General Tab?
H... Could be. sheepish grin
Thanks, Mark.
--
Using The Bat! Version 2.01
under Windows XP 5.1 Build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL list,
Today I upgraded to the latest TB2 and also downloaded the latest
international pack to get UK spell dictionaries. Why is the whole
intpack included in one slightly large file instead of say splitting
up the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm probably missing something here, but to the best of my knowledge
I've always been able to invoke AB level Templates by checking the check
box labelled Use a specific template for..., and then making sure
there were no Folder or Account level
Hello Vishal,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:32:03 AM, you wrote:
V *Yes*. All 5 would have to have the private key to decrypt this
V message, if it were encrypted using the *same* public key.
Ahhh. Hence my confusion over your question. I honestly can't think of
a situation where five people
Hello Peter,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:26:54 AM, you wrote:
PM I'd like to add, it is like a postcard written with a pencil.
PM Alterations on its way are easy. And easily detectable if the
PM message was PGP signed. :-)
Absorutetry Raggy! grin (Scooby-Doo)
PM It should become /normal/ to
NA BTW... what is the main
NA difference between MicroEd and the Windows Compatible [editor]
One difference is that the Windows Compatible will not show squiggly lines underneath
misspelled words.
--
Rich
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:40:47 AM, you wrote:
rg On my copy of TB! (2.00.6) Server | Send to is NOT
rg available under the key manager, or any other option, in Tools |
rg PGP
Don't look for Tools, just open the key manager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
PGP has an option to force an encrypted message to be viewable only
within the PGP viewer. From within Outlook, it's possible to get an
options dialog containing this option by holding the shift key while
clicking on send. Is there a way to get the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Sunday, October 19, 2003, 11:31:49 PM, you wrote:
TF Thanks; now let's see whether it works. ;-)
It works, but only if you have not already modified thebat.exe
- --
Regards,
John
My Public PGP Key Can Be Found Here
Hi Steve,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:39:56 -0400GMT (20.10.03, 17:39 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
SMS ... Unfortunately, my display columns are now messed up i.e.
SMS subject field is getting cut off. My question is, does anyone know
SMS what might have caused this to happen?
Hello TBUDL,
-[Begin Quote]
-[Source - Ritlabs]
Click Here ---) http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
-[End Quote]
--
Regards,
Simon Fincham
Using The Bat: Version 2.01 on Windows XP Pro SP1 Build 2600
SPAM Detection:BayesIt! 0.4gm
Hi Leif
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:22:49 PM, you wrote:
LG Ahhh. Hence my confusion over your question. I honestly can't think of
LG a situation where five people would share a key.
That's why I posed my question in the first place :) Neither can I.
LG I can see in a
LG corporate situation
Hello Leif,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 8:24:08 PM, you wrote:
Monday, October 20, 2003, 11:26:54 AM, you wrote:
PM I'd like to add, it is like a postcard written with a pencil.
PM Alterations on its way are easy. And easily detectable if the
PM message was PGP signed. :-)
Absorutetry Raggy!
Maurice Snellen wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My ISP's mailserver strips any and all characters from e-mail that
have the 8th bit set. Thus, in order to receive messages properly, I
need to have mail sent to me in either Quoted-Printable of Base64
encoding.
I've complained about it, but
Hi Jurgen,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003, at 16:24:47 local time (GMT +0200), you wrote:
JH you mean I have to do that outside of TB, in the settings for the PG?
I would expect that as i can choose GnuPG in Tools/OpenPGP/Choose version,
the caching option in Tools/OpenPGP/Preferences should also work ...
On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon
Fincham said:
Click Here ---)
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
--
Best regards,
Jim D JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
[Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP
Hi Nick,
@20-Oct-2003, 10:15 -0700 (18:15 UK time) Nick Andriash [NA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
NA BTW... what is the main difference between MicroEd and the
NA Windows Compatible... and how do those two differ from the old
NA TB Editor that was so nice to use?
MicroEd is the old
On Sunday, October 19, 2003 at 3:11:13 PM, molescroft wrote in the
message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MW This is very cool. I didn't realize I could display
MW Cyrillic characters without changing the language set.
Nor did a lot of us, I suspect :-)
However, the rich text viewer DOES not
Hello Jim,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:18:22 PM, you wrote:
JD On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon
JD Fincham said:
Click Here ---)
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
JD And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Where is it?
--
Best regards,
On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob
said:
I would expect that as i can choose GnuPG in Tools/OpenPGP/Choose version,
the caching option in Tools/OpenPGP/Preferences should also work ... but it
doesn't.
The 'comment block' option does work, but the 'cache passphrase' does not.
FYI -
Hallo Nick,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:18:19 -0700GMT (20-10-03, 20:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
NA I'm probably missing something here, but to the best of my knowledge
NA I've always been able to invoke AB level Templates by checking the check
NA box labelled Use a specific template for...,
Hi Nick,
@20-Oct-2003, 11:18 -0700 (19:18 UK time) Nick Andriash [NA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
NA I've done that, but my replies show up empty... just addressed
NA properly with the right subject and what not, but there are no
NA quotes.
It sounds like the old two entries in the
Hallo Andrew,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:09:05 +0100GMT (20-10-03, 20:09 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AH Why is the whole intpack included in one slightly large file
AH instead of say splitting up the dictionaries (which probably don't
AH change often) into separate files?
The intpack doesn't
Paul Smithson wrote:
Is it possible to synchronize my copy of The Bat on my PC with
Versamail on the Palm?
Sometimes I want to be able to collect my e-mail on the Palm, deal
with it, and then when I get back home update my desktop with both the
send and received mail.
I don't think there
Hello Steve,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 5:02:05 PM, Steve Thomas wrote:
JD And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Steve Thomas Where is it?
Options - preferences - general
last checkbox
--
Best regards,
Lourdes
The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Hi Steve,
on 20/10/03 you wrote:
ST Where is it?
I installed the new version but for some reason the old the_bat.exe
was left in the folder.
I manually extracted the new exe and replaced in the program file and
v2.01.3 now works fine
--
David Boggon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
More than 3.5
On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve
Thomas said:
JD And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Where is it?
Options | Preferences
It's the last checkbox. It was unchecked already on mine (meaning it's
_not_ sending X-Mailer header by default).
--
Best regards,
Jim D
Hello Marck,
It was foretold that on 21-10-2003 @ 23:22:15 GMT+0100 (which was
0:22:15 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone would mumble:
snipped a bit
MDP It sounds like the old two entries in the AB issue to me. If there
MDP is a second AB entry it may be overriding your nice templates.
Monday, October 20, 2003
5:03:54 PM
Hi,
I missed most of this thread. What exactly is X-Mailer and why should
one be concerned with whether its on or off?
Thanks for explaining
-
Darrin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat 2.01.3
[ The information went data way ]
How to I send the same reply to a group of email messages? If I highlight
each emeil's address with CtrlLeftClick, The Bat! generates a group of
replies, one for each message. I just want to generate a single reply
with a group of addresses.
Thanks!
Steve . . .
Michael L. Cusac wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
giant mess snipped
Sorry, sorry. I was playing with charsets and had stuff in my outbox
I needed to delete. I unparked in order to delete and it flew away to TUBDL, I
think. Again, sorry. If I play around like that again, I will
disconnect
G'day Terry,
Friday, October 17, 2003, 8:15:55 PM, you wrote:
Sorry that I have nothing helpful, but I can confirm the problem.
I just downloaded the latest 2.01.3 Bat! version and it seems like
this problem is fixed. I can get into the Scheduler either directly
or via SmartBat without all
Hi Steve,
@20-Oct-2003, 17:15 -0700 (21-Oct 01:15 UK time) Steve Mary King
said:
How to I send the same reply to a group of email messages? If I
highlight each emeil's address with CtrlLeftClick, The Bat!
generates a group of replies, one for each message. I just want
to generate a single
10/20/2003, 8:04 PM: Darrin said in X-Mailer? Whats the big deal
D Monday, October 20, 2003
D 5:03:54 PM
D Hi,
D I missed most of this thread. What exactly is X-Mailer and why should
D one be concerned with whether its on or off?
D Thanks for explaining
X-Mailer is a field in your e-mail
WH I thought 2.01 was already out.
A I guess there will be a new-er 2.01 build -- 2.01.01 or some thing of
A the sort? I just copied/pasted what I read . . .
Will the new build be announced here?
Elaine
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using
10/20/2003, 9:04 PM: ETM said in TheBat! on a blacklist?
WH I thought 2.01 was already out.
A I guess there will be a new-er 2.01 build -- 2.01.01 or some thing of
A the sort? I just copied/pasted what I read . . .
E Will the new build be announced here?
It was, not officially, by
A It was, not officially, by several people on this
A list . . . in any case:
A http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
Thank you, done deal, and if Rit is monitoring the list, my
sincere thanks to them as well.
Elaine
It sounds like the old two entries in the AB issue to me. If there
is a second AB entry it may be overriding your nice templates.
Yes, it does... but in this case I cannot see where that is possible. I
have a brand new Address Book... in fact, TBUDL is the 'only' address I
have in there. I
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 4:28:52 PM, Luc wrote:
Same problem for me (as Roelof already knows). Two entries meaning
the same contacts but with a different mail addie and different
templates? And that messes TB up?
For now, I've given up on AB level templates and will go with one
On Monday, October 20, 2003 at 8:15:00 PM, Steve Mary King wrote in
the message group reply mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How to I send the same reply to a group of email messages? If I highlight
each emeil's address with CtrlLeftClick, The Bat! generates a group of
replies, one for each message.
On Monday, October 20, 2003 at 11:05:47 AM, Wayne Howard wrote in the
message TheBat! on a blacklist?
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry - I'm fairly new to TB.
We all were once!
A Also, ought to add a space after your -- in your sig. delimiter so TB
A knows to trim . . .
I'm not sure what you
On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jurgen Haug said:
I am using GnuPG and can't find anything in the settings via GPGshell...
If there isn't a specific reason you are using GPGshell, perhaps you
will consider switching to PGP 8.0.2 freeware. It works like a charm
in TB! and has a
Hi,
On Monday at 5:59 PM you wrote:
A 10/20/2003, 8:04 PM: Darrin said in X-Mailer? Whats the big deal
D Monday, October 20, 2003
D 5:03:54 PM
D Hi,
D I missed most of this thread. What exactly is X-Mailer and why should
D one be concerned with whether its on or off?
D Thanks for explaining
A
Hello John,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:29:28 -0500 GMT (20/10/2003, 22:29 +0700 GMT),
John Morse wrote:
TF Thanks; now let's see whether it works. ;-)
It works, but only if you have not already modified thebat.exe
Sure. But now I have the X-Mailer on/off switch. I'll leave it on by
default and
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
