Re: PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Robert Golovniov
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, 4:49:47 PM, Plusnet wrote: P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off P using it. Thankyou Simply put, this is a program that allows you to 1. Digitally sign your

Re: PGP Advice

2003-10-19 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello Plusnet, On 19 October 2003, at 14:49:47 (GMT +0100) you wrote: P Hello TBUDL, I'm a new TB user could someone explain what exactly P PGP is. I'm trying to figure out wether or not i would be better off P using it. Thankyou For more information (and details) you may visit www.pgpi.org

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-22 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Shauna! On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 1:25:17 AM you wrote: SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message SS after signing it? To counter

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-22 Thread Roland Burger
Hi Shauna, on Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:36:26 -0600 GMT (which was 22.04.2001, 00:36 +0100 GMT where I live) Shauna Scott wrote: So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to get it to work with The

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick! On Saturday, April 21, 2001 at 3:07:40 AM you wrote: Freeware or Payware? If you want to use it in a non-business environment stick to freeware. PGP is available in both flavours and in versions 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Thomas
Hallo Shauna, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:39:36 -0600 GMT (21/04/2001, 10:39 +0800 GMT), Shauna Scott wrote: SS (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home SS computer is still on 1.51). Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:36 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote: SS So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've SS downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to SS get it to work with The Bat.

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:46 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote: SS Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the SS signature status comes up bad because I made a change to the message SS after signing it? Hi Shauna,

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Karin Spaink
On 22-04-2001 at 00:36, Shauna Scott kindly wrote: So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to get it to work with The Bat. If I look under Tools-OpenPGP-Choose OpenPGP Version, the only choices

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-21 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 01:25 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote: ... SS That's what I figured, but, of course, I didn't think of it until SS after I hit send the first time. SS Thanks. You're welcome. *** PGP Signature Status: good ***

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On April 20, 2001, at 4:54:21 PM, Shauna Scott wrote: I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP - Good to hear, and welcome to the PGP Community. :o) which version should I use? Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Nick, @ 9:07:40 PM on 4/20/2001, Nick Andriash wrote: ... NA However, from what I've read, there is a current problem with the NA PGP Plugin (which *had* worked nicely with both NAI and the CKT NA builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest Beta's. I see you are using NA Beta 7. :o( The plug-ins

Re: PGP advice

2001-04-20 Thread Nick Andriash
On April 20, 2001, at 7:39:36 PM, Shauna Scott wrote: I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the others on this list (I'm in Edmonton). Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!! :o) Nick =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=N.J.