-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 04 February 2001 at 15:04:20 -0500 (which was 20:04 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
MK I am noticing that there are some users using TB! 1.49c and 1.49e.
MK What are the differences among the 1.49 to 1.49e versions? Just
MK wondering if any problems that I am experiencing have been fixed in
MK those later builds.
Not AFAICS. I know that the 1.49e release was a specific to fix a
problem importing mail from recent versions of Pegasus. As far as the
threading issues are concerned, these issues are "the way it was
designed to work" rather than "bugs" and need a fundamental redesign
rather than a "quick fix". I would say that we're unlikely to see any
improvement in that situation until v2 comes out (whenever that may be
g).
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49e S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOn24SznkJKuSnc2gEQL37ACg4VNdafA/KlzrjE/LNVouD0jqSIIAoPxk
k6HafVaVlOU146X/gAtLDAS7
=4Oko
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
