18, 2000 10:33 AM
> To: 'Mo DeJong'; Scott Redman
> Cc: Jiang Wu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java]
> Thread question in TclBlend
>
>
> Will the C based Tcl extensions work the same with the threaded version of
>
en I will be
OK with requiring threaded Tcl with TclBlend.
-- Jiang Wu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 2:25 PM
To: Scott Redman
Cc: Jiang Wu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] R
d
> into for 8.4).
>
> -- Scott
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jiang Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 11:59 AM
> > To: 'Scott Redman'
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thre
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend
>
>
> In theory, JAVA_LOCK sounds like the right thing to do in protecting the
> notifier of a non-thread enabled Tcl interpreter. However, the
> JAVA_LOCK is
> not released while
Message-
From: Scott Redman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 6:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Tcl Java] RE: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend
I think Problem 2 isn't a problem for what we're trying to
do, but I think you're right that it's
I think Problem 2 isn't a problem for what we're trying to
do, but I think you're right that it's easy to fix.
The JAVA_LOCK() is there to serialize calls to the Notifier.
This is not necessary with a thread enabled Tcl library
(--enable-threads), but is necessary for a non-thread
enabled Tcl.
T
DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 2:20 PM
To: Scott Redman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: [Tcl Java] Thread question in TclBlend
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Scott Redman wrote:
> I was reading Jiang Wu's paper on using Java and Tcl. I have
> a quest
uot;problem 1" because I don't have a clear idea on why
the global "JAVA_LOCK" mutex was used. My feeling is that the global mutex
is not needed. Is it possible for someone at Scriptics to dig up the
original design doc to figure out purpose of the "JAVA_LOCK"?
-- Ji
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Scott Redman wrote:
> I was reading Jiang Wu's paper on using Java and Tcl. I have
> a question for everyone:
Jiang's Wrapper Layer is a neat idea, but there are a couple of
problems with it. You can't really wrap individual Interp
calls because often you need to call other
I was reading Jiang Wu's paper on using Java and Tcl. I have
a question for everyone:
I want to create a single Tcl interp and access it from only
one Java thread, as per Jiang's Wrapper Layer (sending events
to the one "owner" thread). That Tcl interp will spawn
threads in Tcl and have those i
10 matches
Mail list logo
