Please give me your advice.
I've instrumented TclBlend to look for the pattern of execution of
MonitorEnter/MonitorExit calls and have learned this. The deadlock seen
in my code, and now in the TclBlend regression test
AutomaticSignature.test on Solaris with native threads, has these
characterist
I think, actually, that in 1.2 at least if the System property "user.dir" is
set appropriately that is where the Runtime.exec() takes place. I modified
Interp.setWorkingDir() appropriately (which is called by CdCmd.java):
if (dirObj.isDirectory()) {
workingDir = dirObj;
Syste
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Levine Justin-p94702 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was using JDK 1.3, but it still wasn't working properly. I gave up and
> just started using the Runtime class.
> Thanks.
I have never tested it under 1.3. The exec class has this huge hack
in it to get around the fact that the exe
Hello,
I was using JDK 1.3, but it still wasn't working properly. I gave up and
just started using the Runtime class.
Thanks.
- Justin
-Original Message-
From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:43 PM
To: Levine Justin-p94702
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sub
Sorry, it was unintentional. This was my transmission:
Well, JavaCmdProc() is just calling EnterMonitor. Here's the code:
/*
* Invoke the command by calling Interp.callCommand(). Be sure to
* leave the monitor since we are assuming nothing about the state
* of the world after
Mo DeJong wrote:
I suggest that you compile Tcl with debug symbol
and
then attach with gdb (or try the "make gdb" rule)
to find out what JavaCmdProc() is doing to enter
a monitor. That is what is locking up
your threads.
Well, JavaCmdProc() is just calling EnterMonitor. Here's the code:
...
/
Sigh. I can do that for my testing, certainly. But you may recall that my constraint
in production is
that I am not the one that is invoking Tcl--Vignette's StoryServer product is invoking
Tcl. And they are
using Tcl 8.2.0. Not even 8.2.3. (At least that's what [info patchlevel] says.)
Mo DeJon
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Levine Justin-p94702 wrote:
> I have spent some time, and have come up empty. I'm currently using Jacl to
> try to run batch files on an NT system. However, no matter what I do with
> that exec command, it merely flips up a cmd.exe window for a moment, and
> then disposes o
> When I started this project back in March, I could not get anything to work with JDK
>1.1.8, Tcl
> 8.3, and TclBlend 1.2.5, so I used Tcl 8.2.3. I do not remember now what the symptom
>was, just
> that it didn't work. (I am using JDK 1.1.8 because of warnings about JDK 1.2 at
> http://dev.scri
I repeated the test of the patch, with JDK 1.2 on Solaris. Same result...
hanging in AutomaticSignature.test.
Jiang Wu wrote:
> I am not sure about how well JDK 1.1.8 work with TclBlend. I have not
> tested TclBlend with JDK 1.1.8. Are you unable to upgrade to JDK 1.2?
>
> -- Jiang Wu
>[EM
Mo DeJong wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Dr Wes Munsil wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your response. I am running "make test". (I don't know who loads
>whom, but I
> > infer from your comments that that means I am loading a JVM into Tcl.) I had
>removed the
> > MonitorEnter calls from JAVA_LOCK and
I have spent some time, and have come up empty. I'm currently using Jacl to
try to run batch files on an NT system. However, no matter what I do with
that exec command, it merely flips up a cmd.exe window for a moment, and
then disposes of it. I tried CALLing and STARTing, and all other sorts o
I originally chose JDK 1.1.8 because of this statement at
http://dev.scriptics.com/faq/java.html#Q2: "When Tcl Blend is compiled
with JDK1.2, it fails a few of the tests, see the known_issues.txt file in
the distributions of Tcl Blend for more details."
Jiang Wu wrote:
> I am not sure about how
I am not sure about how well JDK 1.1.8 work with TclBlend. I have not
tested TclBlend with JDK 1.1.8. Are you unable to upgrade to JDK 1.2?
-- Jiang Wu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dr Wes Munsil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:31 AM
To: Jian
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Dr Wes Munsil wrote:
> Thank you for your response. I am running "make test". (I don't know who loads whom,
>but I
> infer from your comments that that means I am loading a JVM into Tcl.) I had removed
>the
> MonitorEnter calls from JAVA_LOCK and JAVA_UNLOCK in response to
Thank you for your response. I am running "make test". (I don't know who loads whom,
but I
infer from your comments that that means I am loading a JVM into Tcl.) I had removed
the
MonitorEnter calls from JAVA_LOCK and JAVA_UNLOCK in response to an earlier suggestion
from
Jiang Wu.
The history
This is to announce the release of version 0.5 of SWANK(tm), a graphical
user interface
toolkit implemented entirely in JAVA(tm). SWANK(tm) provides the companion
to Jacl, the
Tcl interpreter implemented in JAVA(tm). Thus, Jacl/SWANK(tm) forms the
analogous pair
to Tcl/Tk and can be used to r
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Dr Wes Munsil wrote:
> I would love to give the answers to your good questions off the top of my head, but I
> don't know what "make test" does and I don't know what AutomaticSignature.test does.
>I
> am just following the installation and test instructions that came with th
I would love to give the answers to your good questions off the top of my head, but I
don't know what "make test" does and I don't know what AutomaticSignature.test does. I
am just following the installation and test instructions that came with the download.
I can look into the makefile and the re
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Dr Wes Munsil wrote:
> I applied this patch and your other suggestion, and rebuilt, and now I cannot
> make it through the regression tests. tcljava/AutomaticSignature.test appears to
> deadlock. Can anyone help? My deadline is near, and I am close to having to
> abandon TclB
I applied this patch and your other suggestion, and rebuilt, and now I cannot
make it through the regression tests. tcljava/AutomaticSignature.test appears to
deadlock. Can anyone help? My deadline is near, and I am close to having to
abandon TclBlend as a solution, which I really do not want to h
21 matches
Mail list logo
