[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Daniel Wickstrom
"Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mo That does seem logical. It looks like the Class refs need to Mo be cleaned up. What do you think of the patch below? The patch looks good. I'll have to wait until tonight to apply it, as I can't seem to apply it to the version that I

[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Daniel Wickstrom
"Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mo There are two cleanup cases. Mo TclThreadCleanup is called when a Tcl thread (one that was not Mo started inside a JVM) is terminated. TclThreadCleanup will Mo just call DetachCurrentThread() to disconnect the Tcl thread Mo

[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Mo DeJong
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote: "Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mo There are two cleanup cases. Mo TclThreadCleanup is called when a Tcl thread (one that was not Mo started inside a JVM) is terminated. TclThreadCleanup will Mo just call

[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Daniel Wickstrom
"Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mo What do you mean by "The jvm attach is done at the start of Mo the thread by a registered proc"? Are you not using: Mo (*javaVM)-AttachCurrentThread() Mo In JavaInitEnv() to attach the Tcl thread to the JVM? This is Mo also

[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Mo DeJong
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote: "Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mo What do you mean by "The jvm attach is done at the start of Mo the thread by a registered proc"? Are you not using: Mo (*javaVM)-AttachCurrentThread() Mo In JavaInitEnv()

[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Dan Wickstrom
If you ask me, you time would be better spent getting the current code into "shape" so that it can be dropped into aolserver as is. The code on the branch is not really set in stone, so if you can provide a reasonable way to add your stuff with only a minimal change (like #ifdef AOLSERVER

[Tcl Java] Re: leaking memory

2000-10-12 Thread Mo DeJong
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Dan Wickstrom wrote: If you ask me, you time would be better spent getting the current code into "shape" so that it can be dropped into aolserver as is. The code on the branch is not really set in stone, so if you can provide a reasonable way to add your stuff