[Tcl Java] Re: How fast is Jacl?

1999-08-23 Thread Scott Redman

Mo, when I was looking at the Makefile.in and configure.in, 
I noticed that the Java compiler flags are hard-coded to "-g"
for Unix (on Windows, it switches between -g and -O).

Could this be part of the problem?

-- Scott

Moses DeJong wrote:
 
 On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Thomas McKay wrote:
 
 You should be able to get the 1.1.1 version of Jacl by downloading the
 cvs tree and running this command "cvs checkout -r rel-1_1_1 tcljava".
 
  I just ran a test of Jacl 1.1a1, 1.2.3, and 1.2.4 and they all had
  nearly identical results (+/- 0.1 seconds).  (I'll be happy to test 1.1
  if I can get a pre-built version.)
 
 The only change I can think of that might make this slower was made in
 the 1.2.1 and then fixed in 1.2.4. If you see no speed diff in 1.2.1
 and 1.2.4 that I have no idea what it could be. Keep in mind that
 I am only talking about using ReflectObject methods here. Most Tcl
 code will be slower in 1.2.4 because of the extra lookups needed to
 implement namespaces.
 
 later
 mo
 
  My only guess is that a change I made between now and the last time I
  tested against 1.1 (which was the version I saw the speed  hit in).  One
  thing that I was doing was calling ReflectObject.newInstance() followed
  by preserve() for many objects.  Perhaps it's here that things were
  slower?
 
  Tom
 
 
 
 The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by WebNet Technologies.
 To subscribe:send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject.
 To unsubscribe:  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.
 To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
 A list archive is at: http://www.findmail.com/listsaver/tcldallas/


The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by WebNet Technologies.
To subscribe:send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To unsubscribe:  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. 
A list archive is at: http://www.findmail.com/listsaver/tcldallas/



[Tcl Java] Re: How fast is Jacl?

1999-08-20 Thread Thomas McKay

I just ran a test of Jacl 1.1a1, 1.2.3, and 1.2.4 and they all had
nearly identical results (+/- 0.1 seconds).  (I'll be happy to test 1.1
if I can get a pre-built version.)

My only guess is that a change I made between now and the last time I
tested against 1.1 (which was the version I saw the speed  hit in).  One
thing that I was doing was calling ReflectObject.newInstance() followed
by preserve() for many objects.  Perhaps it's here that things were
slower?

Tom



begin:vcard 
n:McKay;Thomas
tel;work:919-854-7500 x103
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Microcosm Technologies, Inc.
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Project Leader
fn:Thomas McKay
end:vcard



[Tcl Java] Re: How fast is Jacl?

1999-08-17 Thread Thomas McKay

I noticed a problem when switch from 1.1a1 to the next version (which
was...?) in that source'ing files was orders of magnitude slower.  Now,
I didn't take the time to determine if it was the file sourcing itself
of calling all of the commands (which were java extensions loaded
on-demand) or what.  I hope to have the time (don't I always!) to
download the latest-greatest and try things out again soon.


begin:vcard 
n:McKay;Thomas
tel;work:919-854-7500 x103
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Microcosm Technologies, Inc.
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Project Leader
fn:Thomas McKay
end:vcard