RE: bind some said tcl to perl - all at once

2011-02-06 Thread vadrer
** Cc: Jeff Hobbs; tcltk@perl.org Subject: Re: bind some said tcl to perl - all at once On Jan 19, 2011, at 17:47 , Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote: First, I did not liked the name bind_... either. create_commands obviously better. (or maybe create_tcl_commands

RE: bind some said tcl to perl - all at once

2011-01-23 Thread Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR **
...@activestate.com] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:07 AM To: Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** Cc: Jeff Hobbs; tcltk@perl.org Subject: Re: bind some said tcl to perl - all at once On Jan 19, 2011, at 17:47 , Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote: First, I did not liked the name bind_

Re: bind some said tcl to perl - all at once

2011-01-19 Thread Gisle Aas
some said tcl to perl - all at once I don't like to use the name 'bind_...' for this. To me it sounds like this would bind the namespace together so that subs created after the call also become visible to Tcl and perhaps even that commands created on the Tcl side become visible to Perl

Re: bind some said tcl to perl - all at once

2011-01-18 Thread Gisle Aas
I don't like to use the name 'bind_...' for this. To me it sounds like this would bind the namespace together so that subs created after the call also become visible to Tcl and perhaps even that commands created on the Tcl side become visible to Perl. My suggestion would be to make a