Hey all,
After being laid off for a year, my previous employer called me back to work on
a few projects. It's only a few weeks of work.
Anyway, I'm trying to see if I can save effort (and $ for them) with this one.
If not possible, so be it.
I'm working on an 80 page book containing 40
They want a tiny new figure after Figures 1a, 1b 1c (all related to each
other). This new figure would not be related to 1a, b c. So is it possible
or not to make the new figure 1d? It would save me a ton of work but I know
it would be kind of like cheating.
If it's unrelated, it
First - I'm glad you got something, even if it is a small job.
Second - I agree with Bill - do it right.
If you have to cheat - cheat on the side of not numbering it at all but
personally, I would explain to the company the limitation of the software
(and tell them there are other tools that
Bite the bullet and renumber the figures and references. Then go home and curse
the person who decided to use Quark for this kind of document.
Gene Kim-Eng
- Original Message -
From: Danny G. digitaldanny...@yahoo.com
I'm working on an 80 page book containing 40 figures with
Or... when you go home, remember that you're billing them for the
work, smile, and eat a cookie.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Gene Kim-Eng tec...@genek.com wrote:
Bite the bullet and renumber the figures and references. Then go home and
curse the person who decided to use Quark for this
