Mike Kershaw wrote:
No, it's the next in line, and madwifi uses it as well for radiotap on
linux.
OK, I've checked the patch into the main and x.9 branches.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 13:31 -0500, Randy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using libpcap to capture packets, but by default the packets are
> stored in a buffer allocated "inside" the pcap library (e.g., the
> "buffer" pointer of the pcap_t struct).
>
> Does the pcap library provide any API's that
> >This isn't yet an official arphrd, but madwifi also uses it for radiotap
> >output on linux and I expect we'll have it official soon. If you'd
> >rather wait before merging, let me know and I'll post it again once the
> >arphrd is officially ours.
>
> Do you have any reason to believe that the
Hello,
I'm using libpcap to capture packets, but by default the packets are
stored in a buffer allocated "inside" the pcap library (e.g., the
"buffer" pointer of the pcap_t struct).
Does the pcap library provide any API's that allow the user to specify
his/her own pcap_pkthdr buffer and capt
One odd thought from having read some of the driver code chasing something
else - if you have multiple IPs assigned to a NIC, SOME drivers invisibly
put the NIC into promiscuous mode (so they can do the multiple-ip filtering)
and do not report same to the kernel.
Result: ifconfig shows it NOT in p
Speaking of radiotap, the current tcpdump snapshot length defaults of 68
(for tcpdump without IPv6 support) and 96 (for tcpdump with IPv6
support) don't correspond to the same amount of payload above the "link
layer" on all network types. For most network types, the difference is
small - if we
Mike Kershaw wrote:
Since I'm working more on pushing the radiotap patches into the kernel,
heres a super-tiny patch to libpcap to properly detect the link type.
This isn't yet an official arphrd, but madwifi also uses it for radiotap
output on linux and I expect we'll have it official soon. If
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Guy Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Pings fail unless tcpdump is watching both
Cian Masterson wrote:
Can anyone tell me what changes/hooks tcpdump puts into the
