On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Hannes Gredler wrote:
Is the length intended to print out the whole IP packet length (which in
the case of v6 would probably require chasing down the extension header
chain) or whatever IP header's "next header length" reports?
its works the other way around ... you get p
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 16:55 -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Stephen Donnelly wrote:
>
> > Florent Drouin from Alcatel-Lucent has been working on improving the
> > ERF
> > support in Wireshark. As part of this work we would like to request a
> > new DLT (DLT_ERF) which wou
On Aug 6, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
I agree with you. The server is either really slow or completely down.
Router problem. It's back.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
On Jul 31, 2007, at 7:43 PM, Phil Mulholland wrote:
I'd like to request a new DLT value for our internal header format.
We have a patched version of libpcap that can capture packets from
our custom board. The
board can optionally attach it's own header to the packets, before
the Ethernet h
On Jul 25, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Stephen Donnelly wrote:
Florent Drouin from Alcatel-Lucent has been working on improving the
ERF
support in Wireshark. As part of this work we would like to request a
new DLT (DLT_ERF) which would encapsulate a single ERF record of any
ERF
type. DLT_ERF would b
hi pekka,
Pekka Savola wrote:
Hi,
In tcpdump 3.9.7 (Fedora 7) but seeing the same on FreeBSD, I noticed
that on a similarly generated TCP packet, IPv4 output differs from IPv6
in that "length" in v4 includes the IP header length, but in v6 it does
not.
There are differences as to how next-
Hi,
In tcpdump 3.9.7 (Fedora 7) but seeing the same on FreeBSD, I noticed that on a
similarly generated TCP packet, IPv4 output differs from IPv6 in that "length"
in v4 includes the IP header length, but in v6 it does not.
There are differences as to how next-headers are chained in v4 vs v6.
