Re: [tcpdump-workers] [tcpdump] After setjmp/longjmp update

2020-09-12 Thread Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 18:20:42 +0200 Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers wrote: [...] > We have: > 1) The "old" way, before the patch, returning from all functions and > at the end returning the header length to the link-layer dissector > (xxx_if_print), updating the 'n

Re: [tcpdump-workers] DLT for RFtap

2020-09-12 Thread Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:59:19 +0200 George Hopkins via tcpdump-workers wrote: > Hello > > A few years ago there was a request to assign a DLT for RFtap [1]: > https://lists.sandelman.ca/pipermail/tcpdump-workers/2016-August/000619.html > > Somehow some of the messages weren

Re: [tcpdump-workers] DLT for RFtap

2020-09-12 Thread George Hopkins via tcpdump-workers
--- Begin Message --- On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:16:03PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > I think that I fail to understand some subletie in the question. > I think that RFtap is essentially a new DLT which happens to be able to > include other DLT inside of it? Yes, specifically I was looking