In some email I received from alex medvedev, sie wrote:
> hallo,
>
> any interest in having a -j flag in tcpdump?
>
> the flag would simply jump over the specified number of packets.
> it may be useful when reading dumps with -r flag.
> it may also be useful in conjuction with -c flag to isolate
On Jul 1, 2004, at 12:18 PM, alex medvedev wrote:
this, however, does not work well with relative seq numbers in tcp
packets [maybe smth else too?].
Anything that maintains and uses state information between packets
wouldn't work.
However, what could be done would be something that still runs the
hallo,
any interest in having a -j flag in tcpdump?
the flag would simply jump over the specified number of packets.
it may be useful when reading dumps with -r flag.
it may also be useful in conjuction with -c flag to isolate certain
interval from a dump.
a callback function called spin() could
