Re: [tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions

2004-08-25 Thread Stephen Donnelly
-- Mensaje Original -- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:57:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Kiss Karoly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, [iso-8859-1] César Cárdenas wrote: Dear all: In a capture

Re: [tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions

2004-08-24 Thread César Cárdenas
gt; >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, [iso-8859-1] César Cárdenas wrote: > Dear all: > In a captured file I found '.', S, F and FP flags... > Accordi

Re: [tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions

2004-08-24 Thread Kiss Karoly
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, [iso-8859-1] César Cárdenas wrote: > Dear all: > In a captured file I found '.', S, F and FP flags... > According to the manual: > > flag = '.' and data-seqno = '1' implies the first time tcpdump sees a TCP > conversation. > > flag = 'S' and 'win (value)' stands for the beginn

Re: [tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions

2004-08-24 Thread César Cárdenas
Apologizes for the inconvenience... My algo for finding the number of concurrent TCP connections got more FIN & FP flags than SYN (more than -1000)...Is it possible? It has same behaviour if I do not take into account the FP flags? Many thnaks for your help, Cesar >-- Mensaje Original -- >Date: Tu

[tcpdump-workers] number of concurrent TCP sessions

2004-08-24 Thread César Cárdenas
Dear all: In a captured file I found '.', S, F and FP flags... According to the manual: flag = '.' and data-seqno = '1' implies the first time tcpdump sees a TCP conversation. flag = 'S' and 'win (value)' stands for the beginning of a TCP conversation flag = 'F" implies FIN (end) and flag = 'FP'