[tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] Decode DHCPv6 AFTR-Name option (RFC6334)

2012-11-18 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
Hello, Please find the patch as an attachment. Any comment is welcome. Francois-Xavier Le Bail ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] Decode DHCPv6 AFTR-Name option (RFC6334)

2012-11-20 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
; +                } +            } +            printf()); +            break;     default:         printf()); --- - Original Message - From: François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] Decode DHCPv6 AFTR-Name option (RFC6334)

2012-11-20 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
Problem with tabs, I sent it via a pull request on github. From: François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com To: François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com; tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] Decode DHCPv6 AFTR-Name option (RFC6334)

2012-11-26 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
5:51 PM Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] Decode DHCPv6 AFTR-Name option (RFC6334) 18.11.2012, 20:05, François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com: Hello, Please find the patch version 2 as an attachment. Neither version made it to the list. Do you have this change published

[tcpdump-workers] make check fail on Debian Squeeze

2012-11-26 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
Hello, When I do a make check, there are 7 errors. Build on Debian Squeeze, gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8). Do I miss something ? Regards, Francois-Xavier

Re: [tcpdump-workers] make check fail on Debian Squeeze

2012-11-26 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
It works, thank you. From: Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca To: François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com Cc: tcpdump-workers tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:27 PM Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] make check fail

[tcpdump-workers] DHCPv6 bugs fix, new Pull request on github

2012-11-28 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
Hello, Comments are welcome. Francois-Xavier ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Re: [tcpdump-workers] -W options to gcc

2013-04-02 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
About warnings and gcc specifics, II tried the gcc option -pedantic and I got (among others): [...] ./print-olsr.c:197: warning: ISO C90 does not support the '%lf' gnu_printf format [...] ./print-rx.c:856: warning: ISO C90 does not support the '%T' gnu_strftime format [...]

[tcpdump-workers] autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68

2013-04-13 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
Hello, Tha last configure file is Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.. The previous was Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.. Is there any risks of regression ? Francois-Xavier ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Build and check on a big-endian system

2014-02-15 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
From: Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com wrote:     At present, the Travis test do a x86_64 build and a 'make check'.     So the checks are done on a little-endian system.     He could be useful to add a build and check on a big-endian

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Build and check on a big-endian system

2014-02-15 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
From: Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca so, you are saying we should install a qemu mips emulator inside travis to do the testing... wow.. fork the tree, enable travis, and try it out... FYI, digging more, I used this link: http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/powerpc/ with the file:

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Build and check on a big-endian system

2014-02-15 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
From: Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca The ESP tests are failing because you haven't got libssl-dev Right, thanks ! remain :     dccp_partial_csum_v4_simple   : TEST FAILED     dccp_partial_csum_v4_longer   : TEST FAILED ___ tcpdump-workers

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Patch] print-zeromq.c

2014-03-04 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
From: Gisle Vanem gva...@yahoo.no The prototype and implementation of 'zmtp1_print_datagram()' is slightly different; the prototype has a 'const u_int len' as the last parameter. Whereas the implementation has no 'const'. Hence I get a warning from MSVC. Hence: diff -u3

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Patch] print-zeromq.c

2014-03-05 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
[resend lost message] From: Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu On Mar 4, 2014, at 5:43 AM, François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com wrote: Is it not better to add const in the propotype ? In what cases, if any, are parameters that are const (rather than non-const parameters

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [Patch] print-zeromq.c

2014-03-05 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
From: Gisle Vanem gva...@yahoo.no François-Xavier Le Bail fx.leb...@yahoo.com wrote: Is it not better to add const in the propotype ? Comparing to other print-function with a 'len' as last parameter, I think not. Looking through interface.h for *_print() functions, only these have

Re: [tcpdump-workers] buildbot failure in tcpdump+libpcap on Solaris-10-SPARC

2014-03-15 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
From: Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote: I guess that this means that we also now have testing against bigendian systems.  thank you wireshark guys! As long as it's doing make check for tcpdump. Gerald, is it doing