Re: [tcpdump-workers] Filter complexity and performance

2007-01-16 Thread Jefferson Ogata
On 2007-01-15 13:08, Dmitry Rubinstein wrote: > We are trying to capture stuff using a relatively simple filter (on > Linux, using Phil Wood's PCAP with ssldump on top of it). What we want > is basically to capture the traffic to and from a specific port of a > specific host (say, 10.0.0.1:80). So

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Filter complexity and performance

2007-01-15 Thread Fabian Schneider
Hi, > Will we be able to capture twice as few packets (hopefully not)? I was > hoping to kinda avoid the need to do this test if anyone has already did > some sort of evaluation... Complex filters are cheap in terms of capturing performance. For a detailed examination take a look at: http://

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Filter complexity and performance

2007-01-15 Thread Jonathan Gruenhut
Dmitry Rubinstein wrote: Greetings, everyone! We are trying to capture stuff using a relatively simple filter (on Linux, using Phil Wood's PCAP with ssldump on top of it). What we want is basically to capture the traffic to and from a specific port of a specific host (say, 10.0.0.1:80). So far

[tcpdump-workers] Filter complexity and performance

2007-01-15 Thread Dmitry Rubinstein
Greetings, everyone! We are trying to capture stuff using a relatively simple filter (on Linux, using Phil Wood's PCAP with ssldump on top of it). What we want is basically to capture the traffic to and from a specific port of a specific host (say, 10.0.0.1:80). So far we did it using the filter