Re: [tcpinc] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno

2017-02-03 Thread Holland, Jake
On 2/3/17, 6:27 PM, "David Mazieres" wrote: >"Holland, Jake" writes: >> Should my app set the a-bit? I think this version of the ENO draft >> says yes, because I have altered my behavior in the presence of >> encrypted TCP (and it wasn’t practical for me to authenticate, so I >> qualify as an exc

Re: [tcpinc] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno

2017-02-03 Thread David Mazieres
"Holland, Jake" writes: > 2.a. A scenario for illustration: > > For instance, maybe next year somebody reads about ENO and decides to > upgrade protocol X, their proprietary gaming application protocol, so > that Xv2 will be identical except that the passphrase will now be > HMAC-MD5 of passphras

Re: [tcpinc] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno

2017-02-03 Thread Holland, Jake
Hi David, Thanks for the response. I’ll try to give a deeper explanation on what I’m thinking on points #2 and #4 (“a-bit” and the draft-citing), and see if it leads to any further clarity or easier consensus. Sorry for the length, and please don’t feel a need to respond to each individual pa