Thanks, Max and Kevin!
+1 to Kevin's idea: "Along with paying down tech debt, I would personally
like to see us focus more on fixing what we already have, before moving on
to create new shiny (and buggy) features."
Also, I think that the article might be using "priority" to also describe
Thanks for sharing this, Max. I like the general idea from the article, and
especially that pretty table. I also very much appreciate that the author
recognized that sometimes even cosmetic issues that only affect some users
deserve a high priority, because they are so embarrassing. For example,
Via Corey on the iOS team:
https://hackernoon.com/bugs-priority-3b5cf5f6aadd?source=
linkShare-3607e4b9ed19-1473801964
[My copy-pasta from the other thread]
Some things that jumped out at me:
However, often times the criteria for making tradeoffs aren’t made
> explicit, and can be detrimental
