Re: [teampractices] Good article on why we don’t like what we struggle to categorize

2016-06-14 Thread Kevin Smith
That's true that even coming up with the possible tags can be controversial. I sometimes describe smells in terms of colors ("This smells bluish"), which completely confuses my wife. It's trivial for computers to manage the tags. And it's trivial for humans to spontaneously add a million tags as t

Re: [teampractices] Good article on why we don’t like what we struggle to categorize

2016-06-14 Thread Mukunda Modell
This is really an interesting topic to me personally because I spent a year at deviantART working on a faceted ontology to classify art works by facets such as Form, Medium, Technique and Genre. It was a really hard technical problem to solve and we never really finished that work before deviantART

Re: [teampractices] Good article on why we don’t like what we struggle to categorize

2016-06-14 Thread Kevin Smith
Back in 1990, things were almost always put in hierarchical taxonomies. The idea of "tags" and non-hierarchical categories wasn't really a thing, partly due to limitations of technology. The Dewey Decimal System (for books) and biological taxonomies ruled the day. And it was really frustrating, bec

[teampractices] Good article on why we don’t like what we struggle to categorize

2016-06-09 Thread Grace Gellerman
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/opinion/sunday/the-psychology-of-genre.html?mabReward=CTM&action=click&pgtype=Homepage®ion=CColumn&module=Recommendation&src=rechp&WT.nav=RecEngine&_r=2 Favorite quotes from the article: "This “categorical perception,” as it’s called, is not an innocent process: