Re: [Cryptech Tech] dev-bridge board

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Aloha! Fredrik Thulin wrote: > Maybe we put the RTC in the block diagram before we knew what MCU we > would use... maybe somone had a conscious idea to have a separate > chip, but in that case I don't remember the arguments. I think the external

Re: [Cryptech Tech] dev-bridge board

In that case let's look closer in reprogramming capabilities of two chips and compare dol@ с iPad > 19 дек. 2015 г., в 0:12, Jacob написал(а): > >> On 12/18/2015 10:58 PM, Fredrik Thulin wrote: >> >> >> I don't recall any specific discussions about the RTC, but I think

Re: [Cryptech Tech] dev-bridge board

On 12/18/2015 4:19 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: I prefer structured low-level communication over byte stream parsers in all my security devices, because it removes a large portion of error-prone code not only in the device, but also in the host That's my opinion too. And since, with the current

Re: [Cryptech Tech] dev-bridge board

Jacob, Randy Bush wrote: > > why do you guys use the FT232 (or consider a MPU-based USB interface) > > this is a security device. Here everyone agrees. > usb is a big hole. That's Randy's opinion. I have a different opinion - maybe because I have a good decade of experience with the