In most cases etherip encapsulation works but it fails horribly when the
ethernet header added by ether_output was prepended into a new mbuf.
Add magic code to fixup the alignment of the packet so that the IP
header starts again on a word boundary.
With this my sparc64 is able to vether - bridge
Many network related crashes need some deeper inspection at an mbuf. I got
sick and tired of x /x-ing an mbuf and disect the headers. I wrote a
simple function that prints all important fields in human readable form.
Just call m_print(0xdeadbeef) to print the mbuf at 0xdeadbeef.
Example output:
Informazioni commerciali
Per la tutela del credito, sia nella fase prae-contrattuale che in quella
prae-contenziosa, fornendo accurate informative volte, da un lato alla
minimizzazione dei rischi nell'assunzione di nuova clientela, e dall'altro ad
ottimizzare la fase del recupero dei crediti,
Currently, our bridge(4) code forwards ethernet frames with
destination MAC address 01:80:C2:00:00:0X, except for X=0 (STP BPDUs).
This is not allowed according to 802.1D-2004, section 7.12.6: these
addresses are reserved (and currently used by eg. LLDP). In turn,
this causes issues for ports
Hello, t...@!
Currently, the c++ tr1 implementation in OpenBSD tree implicitly uses
typeid() in shared_ptr, thus using -fno-rtti is not possible here.
It turns out that gcc guys came onto the issue only a year ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42019
The diff:
Index:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
now that the atomic flag is gone, the yield diff is simpler. once again,
the idea is that unbounded (or of unknown bounds) loops in the kernel are
bad because you hog the cpu. so be polite and yield from time to time.
anybody use tables heavily
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
now that the atomic flag is gone, the yield diff is simpler. once again,
the idea is that unbounded (or of unknown bounds) loops in the kernel are
bad because you hog the cpu. so be polite and yield from
Your email client cannot read this email.
To view it online, please go here:
http://my.newsxmail.com/display.php?M=19918804C=971ee1c8133e35124a52eb58fe86f807S=1347L=386N=227
http://my.newsxmail.com/link.php?M=19918804N=1347L=11753F=T
PROMOCIONES 2010
QUERES TENER UN CUERPO PERFECTO?
PLAN CER
