On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:39:53PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
[snip relevant discussion to sidetrack a bit.]
So, what's the answer for someone wanting to do base conversion? If
they use sh/ksh, then the answer is $((...)):
$ echo $((0x20))
32
$
csh shmucks^Wusers can use bc or dc
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:56:07 +0100
From: Alexander Schrijver alexander.schrij...@gmail.com
The big question of course is whether it will survive a make build
with the change that removes the restriction of only using Ultra-DMA
up to mode 2, but without the fixes in pciide.c.
On 2011-01-15 07.43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s.
I think this is a problem.
I would expect a unix utility of this importance to work exactly the
same
On 2011-01-15 08.29, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Benny Lofgrenbl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote:
+ Makes it able to use C-style radix prefixes to integers in order to do
calculations in octal and
On 2011-01-15 07.05, Philip Guenther wrote:
If you're going to email diffs, you MUST turn off 'format=flowed', as
Thunderbird munged the whitespace on your diffs enough to make them
break with patch -l. Thunderbird has an option for that; find it
and use it.
Check.
for (i=0; i100; i++)
The number of IPKTS and OPKTS in systat(1) is calculated by taking away the new
total packets from the old total packets and dividing the result by the delay
between refreshes (naptime). This calculation is performed in the macro UPDATE
in if.c
I think the current description is inaccurate.
On 01/15/11 03:06, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Ted Unangst wrote:
If I type the wrong password into bioctl at boot, disks don't exist,
filesystems don't get mounted, and generally lots of things go wrong. All
I need is a second chance to remind me to type the right password.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Alexander Hall ha...@openbsd.org wrote:
I haven't looked very close but should not the handling differ between
the key_disk vs passphrase cases? I bet there would be a way to make it
loop... :-)
I think you are right. I'll fix that.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:00:04PM +0100, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-01-15 07.43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s.
I think this is a problem.
I would
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Additionally, i very much prefer to have as little as possible
differecnes between expr(1) and the ksh builtin.
Ehum, running the risk of looking like a complete fool I've got to
ask, is there actually a ksh builtin version
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Ehum, running the risk of looking like a complete fool I've got to
ask, is there actually a ksh builtin version of expr?
I did actually double check that prior
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:56:07 +0100
From: Alexander Schrijver alexander.schrij...@gmail.com
The big question of course is whether it will survive a make build
with the change that removes the restriction of only using
12 matches
Mail list logo
