Международная Конференция по Геополитике и междуна =?UTF-8?B?0YDQvtC00L3Ri9C8INC+0YLQvdC+0YjQtdC90LjRj9C8IC0gR2VvcG9saXRpa2EubmV0LCDQodCw0L3QutGCLdCf

PQQP0Q PP5P6P4QP=P0QP>P4P=P0Q P=P0QQP=P>-P?QP0P:QP8QP5Q
P:P0Q P:P>P=QP5QP5P=QP8Q "P$QP=P4P0PP1P;P5PP?P>P;P8QP8P:P8, P3P5P>Q P:P>P=P>PP4P=QQ P>QP=P>QP5P=P8P9. PQP>P4P2P8P6P5P=P8P5 PPP"P P8 PP2QP>Q
P>QP7P0 P=P0 PP>Q
QP>P: - P?QP>P1P;P5PP?P0Q
P=P>Q
QP8 Q
QQP0P= P!PP, P

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

On 2011-02-16 19.04, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/02/16 12:34, Steven R. Gerber wrote: >> Now, I have an EXPERIMENTAL RAID 5 volume. Not the worst. >> *** >> sd9 at scsibus4 targ 0 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct fixed >> sd9: 5723178MB, 512 bytes/sec, 11721070081 sec total >> *** >> But, EXPERIMENTAL

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

On 2011/02/16 12:34, Steven R. Gerber wrote: > Now, I have an EXPERIMENTAL RAID 5 volume. Not the worst. > *** > sd9 at scsibus4 targ 0 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct fixed > sd9: 5723178MB, 512 bytes/sec, 11721070081 sec total > *** > But, EXPERIMENTAL RAID 5 is dangerous (Marco Peereboom). > OpenBSD sof

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

On 2/16/2011 10:50 AM, Joel Sing wrote: > On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Steven R. Gerber wrote: >> Sorry for cross posting? >> I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to >> be no approved method. (4 disks -- I usually like stripe on top of >> mirrors.) >> I believe th

Tecnicas Especializadas en los Procesos de Credito y Cobranza en MEXICO - 22 de Febrero

CURSO TALLER Tecnicas Especializadas en los Procesos de Credito y Cobranza Duracion: (1 dma) 8 hrs. Inversion: $ 4,150 pesos mas IVA Objetivo: Reconozca y cimente los principios y metodos que puede aplicar en el otorgamiento de CREDITO, LA PREVENCION y RECUPERACION de la CARTERA por CREDITOS M

Re: History for bc(1)

On 02/15/11 13:01, Otto Moerbeek wrote: sorry, in have a diff in my tree, but I see myself always ignoring it. I just almost never actually use the editing capabilities. It seems my 25yr finger memory is too strong. So I'm not a proper tester for this diff, other than it does not seem to cause a

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Steven R. Gerber wrote: > Sorry for cross posting? > I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to > be no approved method. (4 disks -- I usually like stripe on top of > mirrors.) > I believe that I have done my homework. > What are my optio

Re: Lynx patch to fix page-down issue. (was: Lynx update?)

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:55:05AM +, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:51:50AM +, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > > [..] > > > Patch below fixes the issue with our in-tree lynx. > > > Top-right shows "(p1 of 2)" correctly and allows one > > > to page down to see last

vlan vlandev fix

Hi! My previous change to vlan(4) allows to change the vlandev and vlan id on-the-fly without re-creating the vlan interface. Unfortunately, I figured out that carp(4) on vlan stops working if you change the vlandev (vlan parent). The problem is that the vlan interface forgets about its multicas

Re: Lynx patch to fix page-down issue. (was: Lynx update?)

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:51:50AM +, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > [..] > > Patch below fixes the issue with our in-tree lynx. > > Top-right shows "(p1 of 2)" correctly and allows one > > to page down to see last line of the page: "line #20". > > > > Same changes exist in the newer lynx sou

Re: Lynx patch to fix page-down issue. (was: Lynx update?)

> [..] > Patch below fixes the issue with our in-tree lynx. > Top-right shows "(p1 of 2)" correctly and allows one > to page down to see last line of the page: "line #20". > > Same changes exist in the newer lynx source. > > Comments/OK? I see the first 2 chunks in the latest lynx code but not