Hi.
It seems I catched some bug in kernel. I use some ugly program which
connects to COM-port and tries to do some activity.
You can see it's source here http://pastebin.com/kHLy26GD
I start it and try to kill it
# ./ct
writing bytes 36[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 ff
Top Shop
Top E-revija: 60, 10. mart 2011.
PraktiD
na rešenja i saveti za bolji Eivot
Budi fit | DomaDinstvo | Zabava i deca | Svi proizvodi
Knjige | Saveti i zabava
Top Shop
HIT TV proizvodi!
Spider Pan - set tiganja
Spider pan - set tiganja
Derma Seta - set za ulepšavanje
Derma Seta
I tried to do a similar thing, Ctrl + C on a fsck, kill -9 the fsck
pid. But the process is not able to be killed. Finally found out that
I/O stuff can't be killed in OpenBSD. Since you do I/O to COM port,
and try to kill it... I don't know if its a bug though.
hope that helps you
On Thu, Mar
Hi, the following displays rejected icmp echo requests sent to bcast/mcast.
Index: inet.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c,v
retrieving revision 1.115
diff -d -u -p -w -r1.115 inet.c
--- inet.c 2 Mar 2011 21:51:14
This diff adds support to puc(4) for NetMos 9922 dual serial
cards. It's pretty straightforward. Tested by me on i386 and
amd64.
ok?
-ml
Index: dev/pci/pcidevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:48:45 -0800
From: Mike Larkin mlar...@azathoth.net
This diff adds support to puc(4) for NetMos 9922 dual serial
cards. It's pretty straightforward. Tested by me on i386 and
amd64.
ok?
Something slightly smarter might be needed. Can you mail out the
pcidump
On 2011/03/10 14:48, Mike Larkin wrote:
This diff adds support to puc(4) for NetMos 9922 dual serial
cards. It's pretty straightforward. Tested by me on i386 and
amd64.
+ /* NetMos PCIe Peripheral Controller :Dual serial port */
the usual style in this file is like /* Blah blah: 2S */
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:20:57PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/03/10 14:48, Mike Larkin wrote:
This diff adds support to puc(4) for NetMos 9922 dual serial
cards. It's pretty straightforward. Tested by me on i386 and
amd64.
+ /* NetMos PCIe Peripheral Controller :Dual
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:14:43AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:48:45 -0800
From: Mike Larkin mlar...@azathoth.net
This diff adds support to puc(4) for NetMos 9922 dual serial
cards. It's pretty straightforward. Tested by me on i386 and
amd64.
ok?
Junk Box Summary for: tech@openbsd.org
The 1 emails listed below have been placed in your personal Junk Box
since your last Junk Box Summary and will be deleted after 30 days.
To retrieve any of these messages, visit your Junk Box at:
http://10.30.139.245:10080
Login using your standard
On 03/03/11 2:20 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:47:40PM -0500, Brad wrote:
Ethernet vlan(4) interfaces have valid Ethernet link layer
addresses but use a different interface type (IFT_L2VLAN vs
IFT_ETHER). Treat IFT_L2VLAN interfaces like IFT_ETHER
interfaces when handling
2011/3/11 Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com:
I tried to do a similar thing, Ctrl + C on a fsck, kill -9 the fsck
pid. But the process is not able to be killed. Finally found out that
I/O stuff can't be killed in OpenBSD. Since you do I/O to COM port,
and try to kill it... I don't know if its a
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:31 AM, David Julio david.a.ju...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Index: which.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/which/which.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 which.c
--- which.c 31 May 2010 14:01:49
2011/3/11 Anton Maksimenkov anton...@gmail.com:
If some process can catch COM port in a way that noone can use the
port and noone can kill that process - it is wrong situation.
And here is the quick path which solves the problem:
--- /usr/origsrc/sys/kern/tty.c Mon Oct 11 22:20:15 2010
+++
14 matches
Mail list logo
