On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:43:28 -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
>
>>Intel drivers later than 2.10 are KMS only, which OpenBSD does not support.
>>The version in tree, based from CVS logs, is 2.9.1 with various backports
>>added from later versions, a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:43:28 -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
>Intel drivers later than 2.10 are KMS only, which OpenBSD does not support.
>The version in tree, based from CVS logs, is 2.9.1 with various backports
>added from later versions, and some one-off work done to support the
>later Intel chips in
table{border:1px solid #99;border-collapse:collapse;}table
td{text-align:center;border:1px solid #99;}
P"P PPP P PP!P/P&P
QP5P2QP0P;Q
PP>PP3P> P;P5Q QP?P5QP8P0P;P8P7P8QQP5QQQ P=P0
P?P>QQP0P2P:P0Q P0P2QP>PP1P8
* Bjvrn Ketelaars [2012-02-15 06:48]:
> >> 2.) Testing (read: does it compile and work) on AMD64.
> >
> > amd64 is easy, better questions are things like does it build/work on vax
> > (gcc2, no shared libs), does it work on "unusual" arch like hppa, etc.
>
> I agree, however I cannot help with the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Hi,
> I ran into a problem with X in a new Lenovo E320 so I put out a query
> on misc and got a rapid response from David Coppa which pointed out
> that my problem was caused by the Intel Sandy Bridge stuff. I didn't
> need to bug tec
CURSO TALLER
Entrevista por Competencias
Duracion: (1 dia) 9 hrs.
Inversion: $3,450 pesos mas IVA
Objetivo:
Al tirmino del curso, los participantes aplicaran una metodologma de
entrevistas por competencias que le permitiran identificar a las personas
que pueden incorporarse con facilidad a la
Hello all.
Resending now, after unlock, a not-so-big patch implementing recursive
"nodump" flag handling in dump(8), for the case the flag is being set on
a directory. Tested successfully for many months on i386. Patch is
modelled after FreeBSD's dump(8) code.
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
A: Becaus
