Hey, dude-
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 04:14:07PM -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote:
A slightly altered version of your diff was applied -thanks!
Cool, thanks!
I noticed you and jmc@ removed the .Xr XClassHint 3 pointer.
What do you think about the addition below?
Basically, I was really confused at
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:32:16PM -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I use it often, but if there is another way to achieve the same thing, I won't
cry over it.
Index: calmwm.h
Hey, dude-
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I use it every once in a while, but I won't miss it. Out of curiousity,
though, what's the motivation? Too many hacks for handling config
changes that should be visible on the
Hey, dude-
Below is a new diff which only sets no if class matches and name is NULL or
if class and name both match.
Since we must explicitly check for name == NULL I decided to also go ahead
and skip setting no if any previous class-only matches were found.
It's too bad the
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:32:16 -0400
Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I use this function once in a while but sure, I can always restart cwm.
You remove a bit of code here which is more
* Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com [121030 04:10]:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I don't know the keybinding for it. It's useless :-)
--
Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
On 2012/10/29 19:32, Okan Demirmen wrote:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
yes - I use this when I've updated the config file - re-exec would be
ok because the window groups etc are memorized between instances,
but I'd quite
MMmhh...
== /usr/src/usr.bin/mg/dired.c ==
Go look the line 729:
if ((fopen(dname,r)) == NULL) {
...
Now you can cry
On 30 October 2012 14:36, rustyBSD rusty...@gmx.fr wrote:
MMmhh...
== /usr/src/usr.bin/mg/dired.c ==
Go look the line 729:
if ((fopen(dname,r)) == NULL) {
...
Now you can cry
What is your point ?
On 30 October 2012 14:58, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 14:36, rustyBSD rusty...@gmx.fr wrote:
MMmhh...
== /usr/src/usr.bin/mg/dired.c ==
Go look the line 729:
if ((fopen(dname,r)) == NULL) {
...
Now you can cry
What is your
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 14:36, rustyBSD rusty...@gmx.fr wrote:
MMmhh...
== /usr/src/usr.bin/mg/dired.c ==
Go look the line 729:
if ((fopen(dname,r)) == NULL) {
...
Now you can cry
What is
On 30 October 2012 15:00, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 14:36, rustyBSD rusty...@gmx.fr wrote:
MMmhh...
== /usr/src/usr.bin/mg/dired.c ==
Go look the line 729:
if
* Alexander Polakov p...@sdf.org [121030 14:40]:
* Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com [121030 04:10]:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I don't know the keybinding for it. It's useless :-)
It seems people do really use that.
On 30 October 2012 15:03, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 15:00, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 14:36, rustyBSD rusty...@gmx.fr wrote:
On Tue 2012.10.30 at 18:27 +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* Alexander Polakov p...@sdf.org [121030 14:40]:
* Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com [121030 04:10]:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I don't know the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 15:03, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 15:00, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 30 October 2012 16:45, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 15:03, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 15:00, Mike Belopuhov
On 30 October 2012 16:52, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:45, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 15:03, Christiano F. Haesbaert
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:52, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:45, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 30 October 2012 16:57, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:52, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:45, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:52, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 30 October 2012 16:45, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com
Le 30/10/2012 15:32, Christiano F. Haesbaert a écrit :
That should be an access(2) call.
Yes.Something like this - also moved len to size_t,
as strlen() is size_t:
--- dired.cWed Mar 14 14:56:35 2012
+++ dired.cTue Oct 30 16:23:00 2012
@@ -724,9 +724,10 @@
dired_(char *dname)
{
Hi,
Flow director is described as a large number of flow affinity
filters that direct receive packets by their flows to queues
for classification, load balancing, and matching between flows
and CPU cores. As we don't support anything like this the code
(that is still compiled in but is not
2012/10/30 Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com:
will anyone miss reload support? one can always re-exec cwm, or any
other wm for a matter of fact.
I use cwm and will not miss reload.
--
To our sweethearts and wives. May they never meet. -- 19th century toast
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:54:33PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
snip
My original mail about the chip (including diff) is at
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=126446213208560w=2, there is
some problem I was unable to track down which prevents things from
working when the port is set to the
Hey, dude-
It seems people do really use that. How about this diff?
In short: do u_exec(cwm) in conf_reload(). This should probably be
u_exec(somewhere-argv0-is-saved).
or use __progname ; also rename from 'reload' to 'restart'
I like this approach a lot. Here's an update which also
Would someone be able to host 2 2U machines?
I could provide IBM X3650 M2 (Type code 7947) machines. 146Gig disks
only, therefore some add'l RAM in exchange.
2 quad core Nehalems (2.9G) and red pwr.
If interested, I'd not complain if shipping could be funded?
Am 27.10.2012 10:49, schrieb Marc
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:40:35PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Hi,
this is the first step in making bgpd faster and non locking on reloads.
The filters are now split into input and output chains. The input chains
are also
Howdy-
It seems people do really use that. How about this diff?
In short: do u_exec(cwm) in conf_reload(). This should probably be
u_exec(somewhere-argv0-is-saved).
or use __progname ; also rename from 'reload' to 'restart'
I like this approach a lot. Here's an update which also
Howdy-
Here is an initial attempt at adding a menu for searching/executing internal
functions. It's useful for those times you want to an unbound function, and
even when the function is bound to some key combo you haven't memorized yet
it can be faster than looking up the keybinding in the
30 matches
Mail list logo
