I do not doubt that emulators can be useful for some things. Indeed, I
use them myself when real hardware isn't available.
but emulators have limits -- invariably they are written to emulate certain
things accurately (albeit imperfectly, because all programmers make
mistakes) while other things
Am 17.01.2014 22:14 schrieb Kevin Lyda:
That's a bug to be filed against an emulator. And it's easier to do
that *now* when the older hardware is around to test for bug
compatibility.
And how do you do that when the hardware has gone?
And I must admit the resistance to this is weird.
This
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Brett Lymn brett.l...@baesystems.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:33:01PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
What other community has users who commonly run upstream software on
64-bit big-endian strict alignment platform with register windows
adjusting the
I notice a lot of people have suggested use an emulator, as if that had never
occurred to the OpenBSD developers before, but nobody has volunteered to verify
that the available emulators are good enough to actually replace real hardware.
Also, I don't understand why anyone thinks emulation
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:39:49PM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
i read the manuals , and well , i am still unsure,
if i put SIGNER=bob in the package configuration
then it will be signed with
/etc/signify/bob.sec
having to read 4 different manual page to get this is strange :p
No,
Hi,
back in OpenBSD 5.0 times, there was a merge with NetBSD's libedit. It
was supposed to retain local modifications, but unfortunately they got
lost. In el.c, they got reintroduced with revision 1.18, but the
following ones are still lost:
history.c: revision 1.13
term.c: revision 1.13
On 18 Jan 2014, at 04.33, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Why is there this effort to convince us to do less?
I do not propagate such a train of thought; only said that if you want
corporate funding then be prepared to detail your costs and justify each and
every one of them
Some time ago I proposed a diff to allow pflow(4) to determine the src IP
address based on the route table if flowsrc was not specified. That diff
was not accepted because having multiple places look up route tables is
undesirable.
Since then henning@ moved UDP checksum calcs into ip_output. That
MJ [m...@sci.fi] wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 04.33, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Why is there this effort to convince us to do less?
I do not propagate such a train of thought; only said that if you want
corporate funding then be prepared to detail your costs and
Hi tech,
I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you can
install, update or delete a firmware package.
It tooks a little while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it
can help the next one.
Regards,
Fritjof
Index: fw_update.1
Perhaps something like this? Only compile-tested.
- todd
Index: usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/printjob.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/printjob.c,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -r1.49 printjob.c
---
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:28:18PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Hi tech,
I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you can
install, update or delete a firmware package.
It tooks a little while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it
can help the
I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you
can install, update or delete a firmware package. It tooks a little
while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it can help
the next one.
You sure did spot a real problem in the man page, which is that it
does
Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk schrieb am Sat, 18. Jan 21:56:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:28:18PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Hi tech,
I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you can
install, update or delete a firmware package.
It tooks a little while
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org schrieb am Sat, 18. Jan 15:02:
I have added some examples to the fw_update manpage, to show how you
can install, update or delete a firmware package. It tooks a little
while until I figured out how fw_update works, so maybe it can help
the next one.
this page does not need an EXAMPLES section.
jmc
What are the criteria to add an EXAMPLES section to a manpage?
Examples should cover either slightly non-obvious but powerful usage
cases that are not entirely expected, and thus lead people to seeing
the power of the command.
An example of
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:42:50PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
this page does not need an EXAMPLES section.
jmc
What are the criteria to add an EXAMPLES section to a manpage?
Examples should cover either slightly non-obvious but powerful usage
cases that are not entirely expected, and
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org schrieb am Sat, 18. Jan 15:42:
this page does not need an EXAMPLES section.
jmc
What are the criteria to add an EXAMPLES section to a manpage?
Examples should cover either slightly non-obvious but powerful usage
cases that are not entirely
As done in IPv6 land report how many packets are dropped because we hit
the rate limiter (net.inet.icmp.errppslimit). On bigger routers it may be
needed to tune that value up in case to many packets are dropped.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: sys/netinet/icmp_var.h
Hi tech,
this diff changes the readpassphrase call to be more like described in the
manpage.
On the users site readpassphrase doesn't really show what the problem is.
On the developers site the flag 0 is not described in the manpage.
Regards,
Fritjof
Index: signify.c
Subject sais it all. One less gloabl symbol.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: kern/uipc_domain.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_domain.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -p -r1.33 uipc_domain.c
--- kern/uipc_domain.c 20 Aug 2013
On 18 Jan 2014, at 22.25, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Mike, maybe you can stop your rambling, and just do the same. Because
otherwise, I don't understand why you feel justified to be on this mailing
list. You were henning's roommate, so that means that you know all about
OpenBSD,
On 19 Jan 2014, at 01.36, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
So, the 1 is the thought, and the 0 is the amount?
Sorry, but your comments were so ridiculous I couldn't help it.
Saying it's the thougth that counts to people who have
repeated explicitly they need MONEY.
There you go again with
On 19 January 2014 12:39, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
Subject sais it all. One less gloabl symbol.
--
:wq Claudio
OK
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
Anyone?
Index: rc
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/etc/rc,v
retrieving
On Jan 18, 2014, at 16:25, Sia Lang silverlangu...@gmail.com wrote:
If the tests are as good as this project claims them to be, the process
should take exactly one test cycle. If that's the case, then the test regime
suck big time. Logic brother. Logic.
I don't know what tests you're
On 19 January 2014 15:57, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
Anyone?
yes, i think this is ok.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
Anyone?
Looks good to me. OK claudio@
Question: should we add the same
We no longer use radix.c in userland since routed(8) was killed
aeons ago. There is no need for this madness anymore so remove it.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: radix.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/radix.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff
On 19 January 2014 16:35, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
We no longer use radix.c in userland since routed(8) was killed
aeons ago. There is no need for this madness anymore so remove it.
OK
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
Here is more cleanup.
Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
a pool(9). Makes the code a lot easier to digest.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: net/radix.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/radix.c,v
retrieving revision
send_packet() sends packets out a raw socket unless the destination is
INADDR_BROADCAST, in which case it sends the packet out via bpf.
Ken
On 19 Jan 2014 17:33, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Here is more cleanup.
Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
a pool(9). Makes the code a lot easier to digest.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: net/radix.c
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:15:06AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Here is more cleanup.
Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
a pool(9). Makes the code a lot easier to digest.
Better?
--
:wq Claudio
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:37 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:15:06AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 05:42 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Here is more cleanup.
Kill the MKget MKfree madness and replace it with *drummrolls*
a pool(9). Makes
36 matches
Mail list logo
