Hi all,
-
1)
If I search for openbsdfoundation on:
- Facebook
- Twitter
- Youtube
- Instagram
- Flickr
- Slideshare
- etc..
I get ZERO results regarding the topic.
We are writing 2014.
The people are on social sites..
More could be reached if these mentioned sites
There is no really good reason why security-relating problems should be a
secret - acceptable reasons for this behaviour never existed. The most
harmful behaviour I have ever seen since I browse the web.
On 2014-04-11 Fri 08:58 AM |, Bob Beck wrote:
sponsors having privileged access to the information (in other words
they aren't donors, they are paying for early access.)
Benefits with strings attached are not donations, ... more like bribes.
Respect for freedom fighting and staying open!
There is no really good reason why security-relating problems should be a
secret - acceptable reasons for this behaviour never existed.
Then you should work very very hard to go find the bugs and publish them.
The most harmful behaviour I have ever seen since I browse the web.
The nastiest
Exactly as I said - no real good reasons. Security through Obscurity is a
reason for me for never trying out the related Operating System - so I have
a reason to never install a *BSD ;)
Wonderful - so why are you on this mailing list. Go troll somewhere else.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Sascha Mester sascha.mes...@gmx.de
wrote:
Exactly as I said - no real good reasons. Security through Obscurity is a
reason for me for never trying out the related Operating System - so I
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:17:24 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was looking through some OpenBSD code and noticed that rs and jot
are both missing #include unistd.h
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:17:24 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was looking through some
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:20:23PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
relayd uses privsep to mitigate the risk of potential attacks.
OpenSSL's SSL code wasn't designed with privsep in mind. We already
have a hack to load the keys and certificates in the parent process
and to send them via imsg to the
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
I did some testing with apache bench (ab) and it shows a negative
performance impact when running with multiple preforked relays and
concurrent requests. But this is expected because all processes have
to wait for the
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:03 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:03 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ralph Siegler rsieg...@rsiegler.org
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:55:13 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014
Well, starting with r1.54 [0], stdlib.h never declares getopt().
However, I think the conversation could continue in spite of that.
I would expect motivation to be aggregated cost in the form:
* a significant amount of patched ports;
* a significant amount of affected port prospects;
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Ralph Siegler wrote:
Well, starting with r1.54 [0], stdlib.h never declares getopt().
However, I think the conversation could continue in spite of that.
I would expect motivation to be aggregated cost in the form:
* a significant amount of patched ports;
* a
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Ralph Siegler wrote:
Well Philip, had we mentioned any POSIX 2008.1 certified or compliant OS
in this thread that would be an interesting point to bring up. But
neither GNU/Linux, OpenBSD, nor FreeBSD is fully compliant.
On the other hand, Mac OSX Mavericks is 100%
15 matches
Mail list logo
