Re: Kill rtalloc()

2014-09-01 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 21/08/14(Thu) 15:36, Martin Pieuchot wrote: As you might have seen, I started looking at routing entries pointing to stale ifa's. This is a necessary step if we want to rely on our routing entries to do address lookups. This audit leads me to believe that the actual check used to

Re: minphys woes

2014-09-01 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 29 August 2014 22:39, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Mike Belopuhov wrote: correct me if i'm wrong, but what happens is that bread being a block read reads up to MAXBSIZE which is conveniently set to 64k and you can't create a filesystem with a larger block

Re: reduce the number of missed PCB cache with tcpbench -su

2014-09-01 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 29 August 2014 18:01, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote: What's the benefit of this? This creates a UDP PCB per connection. Otherwise we always rely on matching the wildcard PCB. I've never seen an application do this; I doubt that. However, things like NTP or DNS servers usually

Re: minphys woes

2014-09-01 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Mike Belopuhov wrote: On 29 August 2014 22:39, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: Yes, that seems to be what happens. But if every adapter needs to support transfers of MAXBSIZE == MAXPHYS anyway, there would be no need for the adapter to be able to override the

Re: minphys woes

2014-09-01 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, David Gwynne wrote: Yes, that seems to be what happens. But if every adapter needs to support transfers of MAXBSIZE == MAXPHYS anyway, there would be no need for the adapter to be able to override the default minphys function with its own. And adapters that only

Re: minphys woes

2014-09-01 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 1 September 2014 13:06, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Mike Belopuhov wrote: On 29 August 2014 22:39, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: Yes, that seems to be what happens. But if every adapter needs to support transfers of MAXBSIZE == MAXPHYS anyway,

Re: minphys woes

2014-09-01 Thread David Gwynne
On 1 Sep 2014, at 9:22 pm, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote: On 1 September 2014 13:06, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Mike Belopuhov wrote: On 29 August 2014 22:39, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: Yes, that seems to be what happens. But if every

Re: UPDATE: xkeyboard-config 2.12

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:52:49 +0600, Alexandr Shadchin alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This diff updates xkeyboard-config to the latest release 2.12. Also includes diff from http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=140750210214198w=2 Tested on amd64 and i386. Comments ? OK ? Compiled

Re: bge(4) Jumbo support for newer chipsets

2014-09-01 Thread David Gwynne
if noone else is going to try this then i think it should go in. On 28 Aug 2014, at 20:32, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote: On 28 Aug 2014, at 3:02 am, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote: On 27 August 2014 08:25, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: Looking for some testing of

Re: bge(4) Jumbo support for newer chipsets

2014-09-01 Thread Brad Smith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 02:25:27AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Looking for some testing of the following diff to add Jumbo support for the BCM5714 / BCM5780 and BCM5717 / BCM5719 / BCM5720 / BCM57765 / BCM57766 chipsets. Here is an updated diff with bge_rxrinfo() being fixed. Index: if_bge.c